2013 QCCQ 7392, 2013 QCCQ 7392

Protection de la jeunesse — 132758 2013 QCCQ 7392 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No.: 640-41-001300-109 DATE: June 20, 2013 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on May 24, 2000 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A of Health and Social Services A, Quebec, District A Applicant and A, residing and domiciled in Town A, Quebec, District A Mother and B, residing and domiciled in Town A, Quebec, District A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (

section 95 ( par. 1) , Youth Protection Act , R.S.Q. , c. P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The Court is seized with a motion to review the situation of X, born on […], 2000. The delegate of the Director of Youth Protection A asks for the placement of the youth in a reception centre for a period of six months. [ 2 ] The parents and the youth are present at the hearing and Mtre. Daniel Ouellette represents the youth. Mtre.

Alexandre Cimon represents the petitioner. [ 3 ] The parents agree with the recommendations of the social worker and admit many of the allegations. The youth disagrees with the placement at the reception centre. [ 4 ] The evidence shows the following facts. [ 5 ] The parents still display alcohol and drugs related problems.

They were evicted from their house in January 2013 and are now living in a cabin outside of the community. [ 6 ] Since the last Court hearing, the youth just recently started to improve her behaviour, meeting with the Youth Healing Services in Town A. [ 7 ] Even after six months at the reception centre, she still needs to be structured and to develop how to function in a stable environment. She just started to develop trust with the educators. She still has to learn more skills.

All the reports filed conclude with the necessity to extend her placement in a reception centre and to receive re-education services. [ 8 ] Considering the evidence, [ 9 ] THE COURT: [ 10 ] GRANTS the petition; [ 11 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X are still endangered; [ 12 ] ORDERS the placement of X in a reception centre for a period of six months; [ 13 ] ORDERS that a psychological follow-up be provided to X as long as deemed necessary by the psychologist; [ 14 ] MAINTAINS all other conclusions rendered in the judgment on April 6 and 7, 2011 by the Honourable Judge Louis Legault,

and more precisely, her placement in a foster family until she reaches the age of majority; [ 15 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the present judgment; [ 16 ] ENTRUSTS the youth's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this judgment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Mtre. Alexandre Cimon, attorney for the applicant Mtre. Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the youth Date of hearing: May 29, 2013