2014 QCCQ 16424, 2014 QCCQ 16424

Protection de la jeunesse — 144528 2014 QCCQ 16424 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 635-41-000539-137 DATE: September 12, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on […], 1997 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , Youth Protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A., working in Town A, district A (Quebec) […] Applicant and A , residing and domiciled in Town A , district A (Quebec) […] Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] After the filing of a petition asking the Court to review a decision rendered on August 27, 2013, by Judge Marc Ouimette pursuant to

section 38 of the Youth Protection Act concerning X, born on […], 1997, the parties submit to this Court a draft agreement on measures to put an end to this situation. [ 2 ] All parties are present and represented by their lawyers. [ 3 ] The parties acknowledge the facts that still endanger the security or development of the youth and the draft details those facts.

The measures recommended to the Court in order to put an end to that situation are enumerated in the draft agreement filed as an exhibit on D-3. [ 4 ] The consent of the parties was given in a free and enlightened manner and this was verified by the Court with the parties. [ 5 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation in which the security or development of the youth is endangered pursuant to the law. These measures respect the youth's best interest.

For these reasons the Court: [ 6 ] maintains that the security or development of X, born on […], 1997, is still endangered pursuant

section 38 of the Youth Protection Act ; [ 7 ] Ratifies the measures enumerated in the draft agreement filed as an exhibit on D-3; [ 8 ] Orders the implementation of these measures; [ 9 ] Entrusts the situation of X to the Director of Youth Protection A for the execution of this judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q. Me Camille Provencher, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection

Me Stéphanie Gauvreau, attorney for the youth Me Marie-Claude Degagné, attorney for the mother Date of hearing: September 2, 2014