2018 QCCQ 14086, 2018 QCCQ 14086
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 184616 2018 QCCQ 14086 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] LOCALITY OF [...] « Youth Division »
N° : 550-41-000945-129 DATE : June 19, 2018 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALMONT BEAULIEU, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ THE DIRECTOR OF YOUTH PROTECTION OF LES CENTRES jeunesse A Petitioner and X Child and A B In their capacity as parents ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT Voie accélérée / Expedited Procedure (Art. 95 al. 3 de la Loi sur la protection de la jeunesse ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for the child or the child’s parents to be identified.
Any person who contrevenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (Sections11.2, 11.2.1 et 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection seized the Court, as per
Section 3,
Article 95 of the Youth Protection Act , of a petition for revision by expedited procedure of the decision rendered on May 10, 2017, regarding X, born on [...], 2008. [ 2 ] In July 2017, the mother lost her apartment and then went to stay with a friend who had just been out of prison. [ 3 ] At the time, the contact between X and his mother were superficial. [ 4 ] The mother’s situation deteriorated at the end of 2017 and the result was that she was detained in the hospital under TAQ until further notice. [ 5 ] There is no visit calendar put in place.
The mother and grandmother like to organize amongst themselves for the visits. [ 6 ] The Director of Youth Protection (the Director) trust the grandmother and know that she is able to put some limits at the mother if needed. [ 7 ] A follow-up with a social worker from CISSS[A] from the JED Department stated in February 2018. [ 8 ] The Director hopes that this follow-up can support X and his grandparents in different strategies to help cope with the ADHD. [ 9 ] Even if the mother’s situation has deteriorated in the last year, X’s situation has been stable and that is because of the involvement of his grandparents. [ 10 ] X was entrusted to his grandparents until he is 18 years old in the last judgment. [ 11 ] The social worker have opened up the conversation with the grandmother about a possible tutorship in X’s situation.
The grandmother explains that she would be ready for that project. [ 12 ] The mother said that she would also be in agreement with this project because she does not want the Director in her life
anymore. [ 13 ] All the parties consent to the present demand from the Director of Youth Protection and recognize that the security and the development of the child are still compromised.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT : [ 14 ] GRANTS the demand; [ 15 ] DECLARES that the security and the development of the child are still compromised; [ 16 ] MAINTAINS all other conclusions of the decision rendered on May 10, 2017; [ 17 ] ENTRUSTS the child to the foster family of his grandmother C until he reaches 18 years of age; [ 18 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child to the Director of Youth Protection. __________________________________ VALMONT BEAULIEU, J.C.Q. Mtre. Gabrielle Leblanc Counsel for the Director of Youth Protection Mtre. André Nault Counsel for the child Date of hearing: June 19, 2018
Loading document…