2011 QCCQ 3805, 2011 QCCQ 3805

Protection de la jeunesse — 11505 2011 QCCQ 3805 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] « Youth Chamber »

DATE : February 7, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF : N° : 635-41-000342-102 X 1995-[…] [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection [of Youth Center A], Quebec, district A Applicant And A, residing and domiciled in city A, Quebec , district A Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JL2340 JUDGMENT (Section 95 (par. 1) Y.P.A. , chap.

P-34.1 R.S.Q. ) [ 1 ] Mrs [social worker 1], delegate of the Director of Youth Protection A ,seizes the Court with a petition asking to review the last decision rendered concerning X, 15 years old. In the last judgment, Judge Nancy McKenna declared his security and development in danger and ordered his placement in a reception centre for six months. Now, the petitioner asks for an extension of his placement at the reception centre for three months with a social follow up for nine months. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the mother and the youth are present, assisted by Me Marie-Claude De Gagné and Me Denis Trottier.

Me Robert-André represents the petitioner. [ 3 ] Admissions are made by the parties and evidence is completed with the testimony of the social worker and her revision report. [ 4 ] It is proved that the youth still display behaviour problems. He is still aggressive with his mother and his sister and does not respect rules. He had two home visits during the placement and the mother was unable to support him. The police had to intervene to return the youth to the centre. The relationship between the mother and the youth remains fragile. The mother is not yet able to assume her son permanently at home.

She needs to develop parental skills to be in a position to structure her son and he has to learn to respect her authority. [ 5 ] An action plan is ready to facilitate X's reintegration during the next three months. [ 6 ] Considering the evidence and the parties' agreement, [ 7 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT : [ 8 ] GRANTS the petition; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X are still in danger;

[ 10 ] ORDERS that X be entrusted to a reception centre for a period of three months; [ 11 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counsel and assistance to the youth and his mother for a period of nine months; [ 12 ] ORDERS the mother to seek help for her personal issues and to develop her parental capacities; [ 13 ] ORDERS the parties to collaborate actively with the social worker; [ 14 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the present enactment; [ 15 ] ENTRUSTS the youth’s situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this enactment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q.

Me Robert-André Adam, attorney for the applicant Me Marie-Claude De Gagné, attorney for the mother Me Denis Trottier, attorney for the youth Date of hearing : December 14, 2010