2013 NBCA 18, 2013 NBCA 18

COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW BRUNSWICK 103-12-CA JULES BOSSÉ, ANNE DOIRON BOSSÉ, LES ENTREPRISES ENVIROTEK LTÉE APPELLANTS JULES BOSSÉ, ANNE DOIRON BOSSÉ, LES ENTREPRISES ENVIROTEK LTÉE APPELANTS - and - - et - FINANCEMENT AGRICOLE CANADA RESPONDENT FINANCEMENT AGRICOLE CANADA INTIMÉ Bossé et Les Entreprises Envirotek Ltée v. Financement Agricole Canada, 2013 NBCA 18 Bossé et Les Entreprises Envirotek Ltée c.

Financement agricole Canada, 2013 NBCA 18 CORAM: The Honourable Justice Deschênes The Honourable Justice Richard The Honourable Justice Quigg CORAM : L’honorable juge Deschênes L’honorable juge Richard L’honorable juge Quigg Appeal from an Order of the Court of Queen’s Bench: July 27, 2012 Appel d’une ordonnance de la Cour du Banc de la Reine : Le 27 juillet 2012 History of Case: Historique de la cause : Decision under appeal: Unreported Décision frappée d’appel : Inédite Preliminary or incidental proceedings: Court of Appeal [2012] N.B.J. No. 107 (QL) [2012] N.B.J.

No. 290 (QL) Procédures préliminaires ou accessoires : Cour d’appel [2012] A.N.-B. n o 107 (QL) [2012] A.N.-B. n o 290 (QL) Appeal heard: January 17, 2013 Appel entendu : Le 17 janvier 2013

Judgment rendered: January 17, 2013 Jugement rendu : Le 17 janvier 2013 Counsel at hearing: For the appellants: Jules Bossé and Anne Doiron Bossé appeared in person For the respondent: Blair C. Fraser Avocats à l’audience : Pour les appelants : Jules Bossé et Anne Doiron Bossé ont comparu en personne Pour l’intimé : Blair C. Fraser THE COURT The hearing of this appeal is adjourned to a date to be fixed by the Chief Justice once the parties have either advised the Registrar that no appeal will be taken from the outcome of the upcoming trial, or perfected any resulting appeal, as the case may be.

English version of the decision delivered by THE COURT [1] This appeal came for hearing on January 17, 2013. It is an appeal against a decision a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench rendered on July 27, 2012, granting the respondent

summary judgment on the liability aspect of a contract claim and directing a trial on the issue of the amount owed. The trial to determine the amount is scheduled for February 2013. [2] At the hearing, we inquired of the parties whether it might not be best to adjourn the hearing of this appeal pending the determination of the amount of the judgment so that, in the event that aspect of the matter is also appealed, all questions could be submitted to this Court at the same time. All agreed. [3] As a result, we directed that the hearing of

this appeal be adjourned to a date to be fixed by the Chief Justice once the parties have either advised the Registrar that no appeal will be taken from the outcome of the upcoming trial, or perfected any resulting appeal, as the case may be. If any appeal on the question of the amount of the judgment is perfected, it shall be heard at the same time as this appeal. ________________________________ Alexandre Deschênes, j.c.a. ________________________________ J.C. Marc Richard, j.c.a. ________________________________ Kathleen A. Quigg, j.c.a.