2011 QCCQ 13589, 2011 QCCQ 13589
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 114741 2011 QCCQ 13589 JD 2182 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] LOCALITY OF [...] Youth Court Division No: 760-41-003876-110 DATE: September 12, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HONOURABLE LINDA DESPOTS ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X Born: [...], 2010 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , in her capacity of authorized person by the youth protection director of Les Centres jeunesse de A; Declarant -and- A , residing at [...], CITY A (Québec), district A; -and- B , residing at […], CITY B (Québec), district A; Parents of the child -and- COMMISSION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE ET DES DROITS DE LA JEUNESSE; ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] Two motions for extension of a court decision is submitted to the court concerning the child X, born on [...], 2010.
[ 2 ] Since the last court order, the child has remained in his father's care. Since then, the mother has maintained regular contacts with her son. Since July 4 th , 2011, the contacts between mother and the child have been increased to minimally three times weekly and now include sleepovers. [ 3 ] The parents have offered a good collaboration with the youth protection director. Also, the relationship between the mother and the father appears to be more harmonious than in the past.
They have expressed their desire to attend conjugal therapy with center A in order, maybe, to return living together. [ 4 ] The mother continues her follow up at center A and is still sober. [ 5 ] Both parents are able to answer the basic needs of their son and they agree that the child could live with his mother. In fact, the child is full time with his mother since August 10, 2011. [ 6 ] The Court is convinced that the security and development of the child are still in danger because of a situation of serious risk of neglect because of the drug addiction of the mother.
The recommendations of the youth protection director are appropriate and in the interest of the child. [ 7 ] Considering the admissions and after the reading of the report, the Court is satisfied and therefore: [ 8 ] MAINTAINS the present motions; [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and development of the child X are still in danger; [ 10 ] EXTENDS the Court order rendered on July 4 th , 2011; [ 11 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child X to the youth protection director of Les Centres jeunesse A for the execution of the measures for a period of nine months : [ 12 ] ORDERS that the child remains with his parents and ORDERS that the parents report periodically to the youth protection director on the measures they apply in their own regard or their child's regard to put an end at the situation in which the security or development of the child is in danger; [ 13 ] TAKES ACT that the child resides principally with his mother; [ 14 ] ORDERS that aid, counsel and assistance be provided to the child and his family; [ 15 ] ORDERS that the parents take an active
part in the application of the measures ordered; [ 16 ] RECOMMENDS that the mother continues her follow-up at « center A » ; [ 17 ] RECOMMENDS that the parents attend conjugal therapy; [ 18 ] THE WHOLE without costs. __________________________________ LINDA DESPOTS, J.C.Q. Me Caterine Caron Procureure de la directrice Me Béatrice Clément Procureure de l’enfant Me Michel Robert Procureur de la mère Date of hearing: September 12, 2011
Loading document…