2019 QCCQ 18709, 2019 QCCQ 18709

Protection de la jeunesse — 198308 2019 QCCQ 18709 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] “Youth Division” N° : 614-41-000104-168 DATE : October 11, 2019 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, [...] Applicant and X, born on [...], 2011 Child and A, residing and domiciled in [...] Mother _____________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (sections 38, 75 & 91 of the Y.P.A ., CQLR, c.

P-34.1 ) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified. Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection A (the Director) asks the Court to review and extend the decision rendered by the undersigned on August 23, 2018.

He asks that the child remain placed in a foster home for another year. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the child is present with her lawyer, Mtre Yan Massé. The mother is absent, but represented by Mtre Michel Grenier. Mtre Magdelena Lempicka represents the applicant. [ 3 ] The child admits all the allegations and agrees with the recommendations. For the mother, Mtre Grenier admits all the facts and also agrees. A revision report is filed. [ 4 ] The evidence reveals the following facts. [ 5 ] In June 2019, the child was moved to another foster home.

She was in the other foster family since January 7, 2019, but the foster mother could no longer foster her. [ 6 ] She integrated a new foster home on June 12, 2019. Up to now, she is well adapted in the family. The foster parents are committed to a long-term plan, if the child agrees. [ 7 ] Since February 2019, the mother did not visit the child. She lives in City A since March and her whereabouts are unknown. She does not have a stable domicile. She continues to have issues with alcohol and drugs. She did not attend any treatment program to address her issues.

She does not collaborate with the Director. [ 8 ] Considering the evidence, the Court endorses the recommendations. As the child just integrated a new foster home, we need to observe if an attachment bond will develop before a long-term placement can be ordered.

CONSEQUENTLY, THE COURT: [ 9 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X, born on [...], 2011, are still in danger; [ 11 ] ORDERS her placement in a foster family for one year; [ 12 ] ORDERS the Director to supervise the contacts between the mother and the child as for the frequency and all modalities; [ 13 ] ORDERS the Director to provide aid, counsel and assistance for a period of one year;

[ 14 ] ORDERS that the child receive psychological services and follow-ups, based on the recommendation of the professionals; [ 15 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child, X, to the Director of Youth Protection A, who shall then see that the measures are carried out. Signed in City B, on November 6, 2019 __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Mtre Magdelena Lempicka Counsel for the applicant Mtre Yan Massé Counsel for the child Mtre Michel Grenier Counsel for the mother Date of hearing: October 11, 2019