2016 QCCQ 6520, 2016 QCCQ 6520

Protection de la jeunesse — 162729 2016 QCCQ 6520 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] Youth Division No: 635-41-000609-146 DATE: May 3 rd 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESIDING: THE HONOURABLE JEAN GRAVEL, J.Q.C. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on [...] 2002 Child [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, working in Town A Applicant and A, residing and domiciled in Town A, Quebec, district A Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ( Sections 95 and 75 , Youth Protection Act , R.S.Q. c.

P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection asks the Court to review the decisions made on November 10 th 2015 concerning X. [ 2 ] The child and the mother were present in Court on May 3 rd 2016 in Town B. [ 3 ] They admitted most of the alleged facts and agreed that the measures proposed by the Director be ordered. [ 4 ] The child is a 13 years old boy who lives with his mother. [ 5 ] He has a hard time respecting the rules and regulations set at home by his mother.

He comes home late after his curfew. He demonstrates aggressive behaviours at school. He bullies some of his peers in school. [ 6 ] He was suspended two weeks from school because of his behaviours. [ 7 ] He often goes to his sister’s place where drug abuse often occurs. [ 8 ] The mother says that the child has stolen $2,000 from members of his family.

He admits doing so but does not know the exact amount he has taken. [ 9 ] The relationship between the mother and the child has improved. [ 10 ] The mother’s collaboration with the social services is good. [ 11 ] The child and the mother still need help and guidance from social services. FOR ALL THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 12 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 13 ] DECLARES that the security and development of the child, X, are still in danger; [ 14 ] REVISES and EXTENDS the decision rendered on November 10 th 2015;

[ 15 ] ORDERS that the child remain with the mother; [ 16 ] ORDERS that the mother report periodically to the Director of Youth Protection on the measures she applies in her own regard or in the child’s regard to put an end to the situation of compromission; [ 17 ] ORDERS that the child and the mother take an active

part in the application of the measures; [ 18 ] ORDERS that the child attend school on a daily basis or another place of learning or participate in a program geared to developing skills and autonomy; [ 19 ] ORDERS that the child and the family receive the services of an external educator for the period deemed necessary by the professionals; [ 20 ] ORDERS that the mother remain sober in the presence of the child; [ 21 ] RECOMMENDS that that mother seek help through social services concerning her alcohol, drugs and personal issues; [ 22 ] ORDERS that a person working for an institution or body provide aid, counsel and assistance to the child and the family; [ 23 ] ORDERS the police to collaborate to the execution of the enactment; [ 24 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child, X, to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of the measures; [ 25 ] THE WHOLE until October 30 th 2016. __________________________________ JEAN GRAVEL, J.Q.C.

Mtre Geneviève Apollon, Attorney for the applicant Mtre Nicolas Welt, Attorney for the child Mtre Marie-Claude De Gagné, Attorney for the mother