2012 QCCQ 15591, 2012 QCCQ 15591
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 123266 2012 QCCQ 15591 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division N os : 640-41-001272-100 and 640-41-001273-108 DATE: April 27, 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF : X, born on […], 2002 Y, born on […], 2008 MRS [SOCIAL WORKER], Youth Protection Worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A., Quebec, district A Petitioner and MRS A, residing and domiciled in City A, Quebec, district A Mother and MR B, residing and domiciled in City B, Quebec, district A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Sections 76.3, 76.4 and 95 (par. 1) Y.P.A. , chap.
P-34.1 R.S.Q. ) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] Mrs [Social Worker], delegate duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, asks the Court to review the decisions rendered by Honourable Judge Marc E. Grimard on December 13, 2011 concerning the situation of X, born on […], 2002, and Y, born on […], 2008.
She asks that X remain in a foster family for an additional 18 months with progressive reintegration with her mother if the situation allows it and that Y be placed in a foster family for a period of three months and be reintegrated in his mother's home if the situation allows it. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the parents are present. The mother is represented by Me Sarah Plamondon.
Me Yan Massé represents the children and Me Robert-André Adam the petitioner. [ 3 ] According to Sections 76.3 and 76.4 of the Youth Protection Act , the parties produce two draft agreements, and following the comments of the children's lawyer, the Court concludes that the measures agreed upon are in the children's best interest and in the respect of their rights. [ 4 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT : [ 5 ] GRANTS the petitions; [ 6 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X and Y are still in danger; [ 7 ] ACKNOWLEDGES the agreements filed as exhibit D-2 and annexed to the present judgment; [ 8 ] ORDERS the implementation of the measures applicable agreed upon by the parties and listed in paragraph 3 of the agreements; [ 9 ] ENTRUSTS the children's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing the measures agreed upon. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q.
Me Robert-André Adam, attorney for the petitioner Me Sarah Plamondon, attorney for the mother Me Yan Massé, attorney for the children Date of hearing: April 4, 2012
Loading document…