2012 QCCQ 15055, 2012 QCCQ 15055

Protection de la jeunesse — 126412 2012 QCCQ 15055 JT 1052 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] LOCALITY OF [...] Youth Division No: 550-41-000612-109 DATE: November 23 rd , 2012 (June 12, 2012) ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HONOURABLE LOUISE TURPIN ______________________________________________________________________ In the case of: X Born [...], 2000 ______________________________________________________________________ CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The Court is seized of a petition under

section 95 of the Youth Protection Act. [ 2 ] At the beginning of the hearing, the attorney for the Director of the Youth Protection stated that this petition is based on the following motives: ▪ The visits between the mother and the child were to be done at "[Organism A]" as per the judgment of February 6 th , 2012; ▪ The organism withdrew their mandate to supervise the visits and it is no longer possible for the visits to occur in the said establishment; ▪ It is in the best interest of the child that the visits with the mother be held in another location; [ 3 ] The Court, with the consent of the youth's attorney, read the following report filed by Me Sandra Couture, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection: D-1 Court Report dated April 30, 2012; [ 4 ] Given the consent of all parties with the social practitioner's recommendations; CONSEQUENTLY THE COURT : DECLARES that the security and development of the youth is still compromise; GRANTS the petition; REVISES the decision rendered February 6 th , 2012; ORDERS that the child remain in his father's care, Mr A; ORDERS that the visits between the child and his mother be supervised until deemed necessary and that they happen at a place designated by the DYP and in accordance to the mother's personal situation and in the child's best interest; ORDERS that the visits be English speaking; RECOMMENDS that Mrs B receives the services that she requires (psychiatric assessment for her mental health, parental abilities, counselling for separation conflict) and she follows the recommendations of the professionals; ORDERS that Mr.

A receives services that he requires (counselling for separation conflict);

ORDERS that the child receives services that he requires (psychosocial follow up); ORDERS that Mrs B not have violent behaviours or/verbalization towards the CJO worker, the father, his friends, the school and any other persons or place; ORDERS that both parents have to contact the CJ[A] worker periodically and inform her of their situation and progress; ORDERS that both parents collaborate with the elaboration and the actualisation of the plan of intervention; RECOMMENDS that the parents actualise the procedures in Superior court regarding the legal custody of the child within the next twelve months; ODERS that a person authorised by the Director of the Youth Protection provide aid, counsel and assistance to the child and the family for nine (9) months; ENTRUSTS the situation of the child to the Director of Youth protection who shall then see that the measures are carried out. __________________________________ LOUISE TURPIN, J.C.Q.

M e Sandra Couture Attorney of the D.P.J. M e Daniel Lessard Attorney of the child M e Anne-France Gagnon Attorney of the father Date of hearing: June 12, 2012