2019 QCCQ 15090, 2019 QCCQ 15090

Protection de la jeunesse — 194670 2019 QCCQ 15090 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF […] TOWN OF […] Youth Division No. 635-41-000242-088 DATE: June 27, 2019 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENISE DESCÔTEAUX J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on [… ] , 2004 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, working in Town A, district A Applicant and A, residing and domiciled at [ … ] , district A Adoptive Mother and B, residing and domiciled at [ … ] , district A Adoptive Father and C, residing and domiciled at [ … ] , district A Biological Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (section 95 (para. 1) of the Youth Protection Act , P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publication or broadcast of information allowing a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 YPA). [ 1 ] [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker of the Director of Youth Protection in Town A is submitting a motion asking for the revision of the last judgment rendered on August 26, 2009, by the Honourable Denyse Leduc, J.C.Q., concerning the situation of X, 15 years old. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the mother was not present. The adolescent was represented by Mtre. Caroline Jennis, and Mtre. Geneviève Apollon represented the petitioner. Ms.

A, adoptive mother, was present. [ 3 ] In the last judgment, the youth was placed with a foster family until he reached the age of majority. However, he remained in the same foster family, namely of his biological maternal aunt Ms.

A and he is doing well. [ 4 ] The biological mother is not regularly involved in the life of the youth. [ 5 ] In October 2017, the traditional adoption process was complete by the adoptive parents and the biological mother. [ 6 ] The security and development of the youth are no longer in danger. [ 7 ] Considering the admissions and the reports, the Court believes that the facts proven and admitted allowing for the revision of the previous order and that it is in the adolescent’s interest and in keeping with his rights to render a new order.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 8 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 9 ] REVISE the decision rendered on August 26, 2009; [ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X are no longer in danger. __________________________________ DENISE DESCÔTEAUX J.C.Q.

Mtre. Geneviève Apollon Cain Lamarre Counsel for the petitioner Mtre. Caroline Jennis Legal Aid Office of Town B Counsel for the youth Mrs A Adoptive Mother Date of hearing: May 13, 2019