Chandroo c. R. 2018 QCCA 1396 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-10-006122-160, 500-10-006385-171 (505-01-106240-126, 505-01-106241-124) MINUTES OF THE HEARING DATE: AUGUST 29, 2018 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE LOUIS ROCHETTE , J.A. MARK SCHRAGER , J.A. PATRICK HEALY , J.A. N o : 500-10-006122-160 APPELLANT COUNSEL RICHARD CHANDROO In Person RESPONDENT COUNSEL SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE Mtre MAXIME HEBRARD (Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales) N o : 500-10-006385-171 APPELLANT COUNSEL RICHARD CHANDROO In person RESPONDENT COUNSEL SA MAJESTÉ LA REINE Mtre MAXIME HEBRARD (Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales)

500-10-006122-160 On appeal from a judgment rendered on February 19, 2016 by the Honourable Judge Anne-Marie Jacques of the Court of Québec, District of Longueuil. 500-10-006385-171 On appeal from a judgment rendered on February 20, 2017 by the Honourable Judge Anne-Marie Jacques of the Court of Québec, District of Longueuil. NATURE OF THE APPEAL : 500-10-006122-160 Conviction – Art. 380(1) a ), 362(1) c )3) and 363(1)

d) of the Criminal Code . 500-10-006385-171 Referred motion to seek leave to appeal from sentence. Clerk: Lory Beauregard Courtroom: Pierre-Basile-Mignault HEARING 11:46 Commencement of the hearing. Exchanges between the Court and Mr. Chandroo. The Court wishes to hear the submissions from Mtre Hébrard. 11:47 Submissions by Mtre Hébrard. 11:59 Submissions by Mr. Chandroo applying for postponement of today’s hearing. 12:00 Recess of the hearing. 12:02 Resumption of the hearing. On the verbal application for postponement : BY THE COURT : judgment on the postponement of the hearing – see page 3. Submissions by Mr.

Chandroo. 12:14 Submissions by Me Hébrard in regards with the grounds of appeal. 12:29 Submissions by Mr. Chandroo in regards with the sentence. 12:32 Submissions by Me Hébrard in regards with the sentence. Me Hébrard submits an additional authority. 12:33 Rebuttal from Mr. Chandroo.

12:34 The matter is taken under advisement. Conclusion of the hearing. (

s) Lory Beauregard Clerk BY THE COURT JUDGMENT [ 1 ] The appellant has already submitted a motion for postponement which was refused by the Court. THEREFORE, THE COURT: [ 2 ] DISMISSES the appellant’s motion for postponement. Louis rochette, j.a. Mark Schrager, J.A. Patrick healy, J.A.