2016 QCCQ 19802, 2016 QCCQ 19802

Protection de la jeunesse — 16641 2016 QCCQ 19802 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000697-151 610-41-000698-159 610-41-000699-157 DATE: January 20, 2016 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on […] 2011 Y , born on […] 2004 Z , born on […] 2006 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , Youth Protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection exercising her profession at the Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux A, having a place of business at [...] in Town A, district A Applicant and A , residing and domiciled at […] in Town A, district A Mother And B , residing and domiciled at […] in Town A, district A Father of X and Z ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection asks the Court to declare that the security or development of X, born on […] 2011, Y, born on […] 2004 and Z, born on […] 2006, is compromised pursuant to sections b) 1° ii, iii and b) 2° of

article 38 of the Youth Protection Act . [ 2 ] The parents are present and represented. Y and Z are present but all of the children are represented. [ 3 ] All the parties declare that the Director of Youth Protection’s petitions are not challenged. They file on D-9 a draft agreement for each child. The parties acknowledge the facts that endanger the security or development of the children.

They propose some measures to put an end to that situation. [ 4 ] The consent of the parties was given in a free and enlightened manner and the Court has verified with them the validity of their consent. [ 5 ] The Court considers that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation in which the security or development of the children is compromised. These measures respect their rights and are in their best interests.

For these motives the Court: [ 6 ] Declares that the security or development X, born on […] 2011, Y, born on […] 2004 and Z, born on […] 2006, is compromised pursuant to sections b) 1° ii, iii and b) 2° of

article 38 of the Youth Protection Act ; [ 7 ] Ratifies the measures enumerated in the draft agreements filed on D-9; [ 8 ] Orders the implementation of the measures mentioned in the draft agreements; [ 9 ] Entrusts the situation of the children to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of the present judgment.

__________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q. Me Julie Lemire, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Sébastien Lebel, attorney for the children Me Peggy Warolin, attorney for the parents Date of hearing: December 9, 2015