2018 QCCA 2065, 2018 QCCA 2065

Light c. R. 2018 QCCA 2065 COURT OF APPEAL CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC REGISTRY OF MONTREAL No: 500-10-004643-100 (500-01-011487-060) DATE: December 7, 2018 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE ALLAN R. HILTON, J.A. MARIE-FRANCE BICH, J.A. PATRICK HEALY, J.A. VINCENT GREGORY LIGHT APPLICANT – Accused v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN RESPONDENT – Prosecutrix JUDGMENT [ 1 ] The Court is seized of an undated and untitled motion presented by Vincent Gregory Light that reads as follows: I will present and read this motion in front of the three Honourable Judges of the Court of Appeal and Crown Prosecutor.

The Crown Prosecutor will present all evidence to the three Honourable Judges of the Court of Appeal in front of myself immediately. I’m reopening my case. A terrible situation that was recreated and encouraged by the Salvation Army at 880 Guy Street Montreal Quebec between 2006-2011 was done to purposely inflict and cause harm to my ex-wife, our daughter and then to myself. This was created illegally without my consent and against my state of mind. I was raped of my rights to a lawyer by the staff of the Salvation Army.

This violent act of hate was encouraged by the Salvation Army by also an Appeal I was encouraged to submit but did not want to do. This will also be given to the three Honourable judges at the Court of Appeal by the Crown Prosecutor. The Appeal should have gone against the Salvation Army! Under the Quebec and Canadian Charter of Rights I was raped of my rights by the Salvation Army at 880 Guy Street Montreal Quebec between 2006 and 2011.

I was mentally manipulated – emotionally abused, tortured and coerced into a violent act of hate that was re-created by the Salvation Army at 880 Guy Street Montreal Quebec between 2006-2011. I was taken advantage. I’m claiming for damages - the full amount of 25 million dollars and free food – groceries of any amount from around the world from any restaurant grocery store supermarket etc. to go directly to me – Vincent Light. Including soft drinks – milk and juices of all kinds any time for day/night for life of mine. The demanding for police protection 24/7 for life against any who continue to cause me harm.

The damages can be explained from the documents submitted by myself or the Crown prosecutor that have been given to the three honourable judges of the Court of Appeal of Montreal. I’m also demanding everything that is mentioned in the documents given to the three honourable judges of the Court of Appeal. This includes the following: my daughter – my life – my freedom – my dreams – my name cleared – and half my property that I won in the divorce. Again also the full amount of 25 million dollars and groceries for life payable to Vincent Light.

The Crown prosecutor will either call Me (illegible) Perrault or Me Norman Schwartz to confirm this matter. Any transcript from trial that the Crown prosecutor at the time telling or informing the courts that I won the divorce immediately. A letter will go out by the Court of Appeal to my ex-wife Nancy Pachal informing her of my rights to her daughter have been immediately activated. Re-instating my relationship with my daughter that was taken away by the Salvation Army at 880 Guy Street Montreal Quebec between 2006-2011.

The property will include half the amount of the house and $17,000/thousand dollars of RSP I used for a down payment. The latter will go directly to Nancy and Sarah Pachal living at: […], Pincourt, Quebec […] immediately. That not one person on this planet will allowed to come between Mr. Vincent Light, Sarah Pachal and Nancy Pachal again. With all this being said and proven with documents submitted to the three Honourable Judges of the Court of Appeal.

Action against the Salvation Army at 880 Guy Street Montreal Quebec will take effect immediately for a violent act of hate that was purposely re-created to inflict harm and pain against my ex-wife, our daughter and to myself. [ 2 ] Publicly available court records show that on December 11, 2008 Mr. Light was convicted in the Court of Quebec (the Hon. Gilles Cadieux, J.C.Q.) of one count of criminal harassment contrary to s. 264(1) Cr.C . He was subsequently sentenced to a form of punishment that did not require his incarceration. [ 3 ] On April 28, 2010 Duval Hesler, J.A., as she then was, dismissed a motion Mr.

Light brought that he characterized as a motion for leave to appeal beyond the delays. [1] It could not be granted, however, since 16 months had elapsed since the judgment of conviction. In the interim Mr. Light had not manifested an intention to appeal. His motion also led my colleague to note that if its text was to be interpreted as one to reserve his rights to claim damages, it could not be granted since “(S)uch claims must first be made in the Quebec Court or the Superior Court of Quebec.” [ 4 ] Mr.

Light then presented another motion “to hear my case and re-open it to clear my name” and “to get back what was wrongfully taken away [from] me” that Kasirer, J.A., sitting as a judge alone, dismissed on October 1, 2018. [2] The essence of that motion appears to have been an attempt to revise the judgment that Duval Hesler, J.A. had rendered on April 28, 2010, a proceeding that was not within the purview of another judge in chambers. [ 5 ] Next, a mere two weeks later, on October 15, Vauclair, J.A. dismissed a further motion of Mr.

Light that he characterized as one seeking “to overturn the decision of my colleague on the ground that he (Mr. Light) has evidence of a civil wrong from the prosecution or some other person”. In his closing remarks, my colleague encouraged Mr. Light “to seek counsel in order to understand his rights”. [3] [ 6 ] Clearly, Mr. Light has not done so. [ 7 ] No provision of the Criminal Code or the Rules of the Court of Appeal in Criminal Matters grants any power to a judge sitting alone or the Court to adjudicate a motion such as that of Mr. Light alleging the facts and seeking the conclusions it contains.

It will therefore be dismissed. [ 8 ] Since this is the fourth time Mr. Light has sought to reopen a matter which has long since been terminated and more recently to seek civil relief as if the Court of Appeal was empowered to exercise the original jurisdiction of a trial court, which it is not, the Court will issue a declaration stipulating the definitive closure of this file for all legal purposes. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 9 ] DISMISSES Mr. Light’s undated motion heard on December 3, 2018; [ 10 ] DECLARES the definitive closure of this file for all legal purposes. ALLAN R. HILTON, J.A.

MARIE-FRANCE BICH, J.A. PATRICK HEALY, J.A. Mr. Vincent Gregory Light In person Mtre Marie-Ève Mayer Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions

For respondent Date of hearing: December 3, 2018