2014 QCCQ 13453, 2014 QCCQ 13453

Protection de la jeunesse — 142018 2014 QCCQ 13453 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division DATE: March 25, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE MARC OUIMETTE, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ [INTERVENANTE 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection of the A , working in A Applicant and X, born on [...], 2002 # 640-41-001438-123 Y, born on [...], 2010 # 640-41-001439-121 Z, born on [...], 2003 # 640-41-001440-129 Children and A Mother and B Father of Y and Z ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ( sections 95 ( par. 1) and 75 , Youth Protection Act , CQLR, c.

P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing a child or the child’s parents to be identified. Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The Director of Youth Protection applied, under

section 95 of the Youth Protection Act , [1] for the review of the decision concerning the three children rendered on July 16, 2013 by Marc E. Grimard J.C.Q. [ 2 ] X was entrusted to her maternal grandmother in CITY A and Z was fostered by his grandmother’s biological sister in CITY B . [ 3 ] At the hearing, the father and the mother were present and were assisted by counsel. Counsel met with the two oldest children and represented them. [ 4 ] The parents would like to have all their children in CITY A . They agreed that X will stay with the maternal grandmother until her majority.

The Court is satisfied with this life project. [ 5 ] The parents would like to have the two boys fostered in CITY A by Ms. C , the father’s sister. [ 6 ] The Court heard Ms. B by phone because she did not have the chance to travel from CITY A to CITY C . [ 7 ] She fostered the two boys for two years in the past, at a time when her husband was not ready to foster them until their majority. They are now willing to take care of Z and Y until their majority. Ms. B teaches A in Grade B in CITY A . [ 8 ] The Court heard Ms. [SOCIAL WORKER 1] . She filed a revision report and she is ready to evaluate Ms.

B ’s offer to foster the two boys. [ 9 ] FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 10 ] GRANTS the motions;

[ 11 ] REVISES the decision or order rendered on July 16, 2013; [ 12 ] DECLARES that the security and the development of the children continue to be in danger; [ 13 ] ORDERS that X be entrusted to the foster family of her maternal grandmother, D , until the age of majority; [ 14 ] ORDERS that Z and Y be entrusted to a foster family for a period of nine months, so that a life plan can be built; [ 15 ] RECOMMENDS that the foster family be that of E for Z and Y ; [ 16 ] ORDERS that the parents be sober in the presence of the children; [ 17 ] ORDERS that aid, counselling and assistance be provided to the children and the parents; [ 18 ] ORDERS that contact between the children and the parents be supervised by the Director of Youth Protection as to terms and frequency; [ 19 ] ORDERS that the police cooperate in the execution of the present judgment; [ 20 ] ORDERS that the situation of the children be entrusted to the Director of Youth Protection of the A , who shall then see that the measures are carried out. __________________________________ MARC OUIMETTE, J.C.Q.

Mtre. Robert-André Adam Cain Lamarre Casgrain Wells Counsel for the applicant Mtre. Angèle Tommasel Counsel for the children Mtre. Joannie Jacob Centre communautaire juridique A Counsel for the mother Mtre. Marie Claude De Gagné Counsel for the father Date of hearing: February 6, 2014