2011 QCCQ 9999, 2011 QCCQ 9999

Protection de la jeunesse — 114084 2011 QCCQ 9999 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division N os : 640-41-001366-118 and 640-41-001367-116 DATE: July 21, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF : X, born on […], 1997 Y, born on […], 1995 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, Quebec, district A Petitioner and A, residing and domiciled in A town, Quebec, district B Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (Section 95 (1) Y.P.A. , chap.

P-34.1 R.S.Q. ) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] [The social worker 1], delegate of the Director of Youth Protection A, asks the Court to review the judgments rendered on June 13, 2008 by Honourable Judge Guy Lecompte concerning X, 14 years old, and Y, 16 years old. She asks for the placement of both sisters in the rehabilitation centre, three months for X, and eight months for Y, followed by a placement in foster families until their majority as previously ordered. [ 2 ] At the hearing, the youths are present and assisted by Me Jean-Claude Latraverse.

The mother is absent, even if duly served. Me Alexandre Simon represents the petitioner. [ 3 ] The youths admit most of the allegations and agree with the recommendations made by the social worker. Revision reports are filed in evidence. [ 4 ] The evidence reveals that the youths display behavioural problems. They do not attend school regularly and do not respect authority. Y ran away regularly from her foster home and X consumed drugs and alcohol and does not respect rules in her foster home. Because of the seriousness of their problems, they had to be transferred many times to new foster homes.

The foster parents of X want her to improve her behaviour before her reintegration in their home. Y is now pregnant and she is expected to deliver in August 2011. [ 5 ] Because of Y's pregnancy, she was placed on provisional measures in the rehabilitation centre A House on March 24, 2011. She received there medical prenatal care and also psychological help. She will receive after the baby's birth monitoring to develop her parental skills. She needs to remain there for six months after the baby's birth. [ 6 ] For X, she is residing at the Youth Heal Services in town C and is doing well.

She finally accepted to receive help from a therapist for her personal issues. She still needs counselling and guidance.

She might be in a position to reintegrate a foster family during the next three months' placement at the rehabilitation centre. [ 7 ] Considering the evidence and the youths' agreement, [ 8 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT : [ 9 ] GRANTS the petitions; [ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X and Y are still in danger; [ 11 ] ORDERS the placement of Y in a reception centre, A House, for a period of eight months, starting on June 23, 2011, followed by a placement in a foster home until her majority; [ 12 ] ORDERS the placement of X in a reception centre for a period of three months, starting on June 23, 2011, followed by a

placement in a foster home until her majority; [ 13 ] ORDERS X to attend therapy for drugs and alcohol; [ 14 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide X an individual psychotherapy for the duration requested by the psychologist; [ 15 ] ORDERS that the modality and frequency of the visits between the mother and the youths be determined by the Director of Youth Protection, including supervision if deemed necessary; [ 16 ] FORBIDS the contacts between the youths and Mr B; [ 17 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counsel and assistance to the youths and their mother for the duration of the judgment; [ 18 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the present Court order; [ 19 ] ENTRUSTS the youths' situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this enactment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q.

Me Alexandre Simon, attorney for the petitioner Me Jean-Claude Latraverse, attorney for the children Date of hearing: June 23, 2011