2014 QCCQ 14771, 2014 QCCQ 14771

Protection de la jeunesse — 142930 2014 QCCQ 14771 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 610-41-000559-120 610-41-000560-128 DATE: July 7, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born on […], 2009 Y , born on […], 2011 SOCIAL WORKER 1 , Youth Protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection exercising her profession at the Centre Jeunesse A, having a place of business at […], in Town A, district A(Quebec) […] Applicant A , residing and domiciled at […], in Town B, district A (Quebec) […] Mother and B , residing and domiciled at […], in Town B, district A (Quebec) […] Father of X ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] After the filing of a motion asking the Court to review and extend a decision rendered on July 10, 2013 concerning X, born on […], 2009 and Y, born on […], 2011 and declaring their security or development endangered, the parties submit to this Court a draft agreement for each child. [ 2 ] The parents are present at the audience and represented. The children are also represented. [ 3 ] The parties acknowledge the facts that still endanger the security and development of the children.

The drafts detail these facts. The draft agreements contain measures to put an end to the children's situation. [ 4 ] The consent of the parties is given in a free and enlightened manner. At the hearing the Court verified the validity of the consent. [ 5 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation in which the children's security or development is endangered.

For these reasons the Court: [ 6 ] maintains that the security and development of X, born on […], 2009 and Y, born on […], 2011 are still compromised pursuant to the Youth Protection Act ; [ 7 ] Ratifies the draft agreements filed on D-3 and signed by the parties on May 15, 2014; [ 8 ] Orders the implementation of the measures mentioned in those draft agreements; [ 9 ] Entrusts the situation of each child to the Director of Youth Protection for the execution of the present judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q.

Me Julie Lemire, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Peggy Warolin, attorney for the children Me Sébastien Lebel, attorney for the mother Me Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the father Date of hearing: May 15, 2014