2014 QCCQ 11163, 2014 QCCQ 11163

Protection de la jeunesse — 141547 2014 QCCQ 11163 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] LOCALITY OF [...] « Youth Division »

N° : 145-41-000411-121 DATE : March 12, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE ROBERT LEVESQUE, j.Q.C. ______________________________________________________________________ A Petitioner and X Adolescent and B Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] A petition for revision and extension of order in respect of X (1997 […]) is referred to the Court by the Director of youth protection pursuant to

section 95 of the Youth protection act. [ 2 ] On August 22, 2013, the Court declares that the security and development of this adolescent are still considered to be in danger and orders that he be entrusted to a rehabilitation center until February 28, 2014 for the reasons enunciated in the judgment. [ 3 ] The petition is based on the following assertions and facts:

a) X is now enrolled in school, is attending, and motivated;

b) X has not ran away;

c) X relationship with his mother has improved;

d) The mother has put rules in place for X;

e) X respects the rules put in place by his mother;

f) X respects his curfew;

g) X and his mother continue their follow-up with an educator;

h) The mother still has an evaluation to complete;

i) The mother is cooperative with the Director of youth protection. [ 4 ] At the hearing, the adolescent (assisted by his lawyer) and his mother are present. They admit the situation described at the petition and in the reports, and they accept the recommendations of the Director of youth protection. [ 5 ] The Court studied the psychosocial report, the report of an educator (A unit) and the letters of social workers.

The adolescent's probation issued on September 6, 2013, in [Province A] is also filed. [ 6 ] Considering the documentary evidence and the position of the parties, the Court grants the petition in the sense of the recommendations of the Director of youth protection including the amendments suggested by the latter's lawyer and the conclusion added by the Court. WHEREFORE, THE COURT : [ 7 ] DECLARES that the security and the development of X are still considered to be in danger according to

section 38 of the Youth protection act ; [ 8 ] ORDERS that X be entrusted to his mother, Mrs.

B; [ 9 ] RECOMMENDS that X and his mother benefit from psychological counselling to deal with their personal issues; [ 10 ] ORDERS that X benefits from the services of an external educator to work on his behavioural problems and his anger issues for as long as deemed necessary by the youth protection delegate; [ 11 ] ORDERS that the mother benefits from a follow-up with an external educator regarding her parenting skills; [ 12 ] RECOMMENDS that X receives help for his addiction problem from an addiction worker and provides random drug testing; [ 13 ] FORBIDS X to affiliate with any gang member; [ 14 ] FORBIDS X to be in the presence of individuals who are known to have a criminal record except immediate members of his family; [ 15 ] ORDERS that X and Mrs.

B actively participate in the application of the measures intended to put an end to the situation of endangerment; [ 16 ] ORDERS that a person working for an organism or an establishment provides aid, counsel and assistance to X and his family; [ 17 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of X to the Director of youth protection of the Centre Jeunesse A until […], 2015 for the carrying out of the present measures.

__________________________________ ROBERT LEVESQUE, J.C.Q. Me Louyse A. Lemieux, for the petitioner Me Florence Frappier-Routhier, for the adolescent Mrs. B, the mother