2014 QCCQ 15355, 2014 QCCQ 15355

Protection de la jeunesse — 143460 2014 QCCQ 15355 COURT OF QUEBEC YOUTH DIVISION CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] N°: 525-41-021044-086 DATE: May 30, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE ANN-MARIE JONES, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ Director of Youth Protection A Applicant - and - X Born on […], 2004 - and - A - and - B Respondents ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT

Section 95 Youth Protection Act ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING : The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child's parents to be identified. Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine. [Sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A .] [ 1 ] The Court hereby confirms and gives the reasons for a decision rendered verbally at the hearing of May 30, 2014, in accordance with the requirements of

section 90 of the law. [ 2 ] The Court was presented with a motion for revision of an order rendered January 16, 2014, entrusting the child to a rehabilitation centre for a period of four months, with integration to a confidential foster home when the situation allowed and that the child remain in foster care until January 16, 2015, with a social follow-up and other measures. [ 3 ] Essentially, the Director of Youth Protection alleges that the child still presents with behavioural disturbances related to his ADHD.

The integration into a confidential foster home began in early March 2014, but cannot be completed before the end of the child’s present school year.

Furthermore, it would not be in the child’s best interest to go through another change of school. [ 4 ] The Director of Youth Protection recommends that the child be entrusted to a rehabilitation centre until the end of June 2014, with integration into a confidential foster home during this period and that all other measures ordered on January 16, 2014, be maintained. [ 5 ] The father is not present at the hearing, but has informed the youth worker that he agrees with the recommended measures. [ 6 ] The mother admits certain of the facts alleged in the motion and agrees with the measures recommended by the Director of Youth Protection. [ 7 ] Under the circumstances, it is in the child’s best interest to be maintained in a rehabilitation centre until the end of June 2014, in order for him to complete his school year and to allow him to integrate gradually his foster family. [ 8 ] THEREFORE, THE COURT: [ 9 ] GRANTS the motion; [ 10 ] DECLARES still compromised the security and development of the child, X; [ 11 ] ORDERS that the child be entrusted to a rehabilitation centre until June 25, 2014, with integration to a confidential foster home

during this period, and that he remain in foster care until January 16, 2015; [ 12 ] MAINTAINS all the other orders rendered on January 16, 2014; [ 13 ] ENTRUSTS the situation of the child, X, to the Director of Youth Protection A, who shall see that the measures are carried out; [ 14 ] ORDERS the execution of the present order by any peace officer. Signed June 16, 2014 Ann-Marie Jones, J.C.Q. AMJ/dg Me Nadia Sabik Counsel for the Director of Youth Protection Me François Pelletier Counsel for the child Me Richard Benoit Counsel for the mother Date of hearing: May 30, 2014