2020 QCCQ 6106, 2020 QCCQ 6106
Opinion
Protection de la jeunesse — 203513 2020 QCCQ 6106 COUR DU QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] « Youth Division»
N° : 505-41-009779-192 DATE : May 26, 2020 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESIDED BEFORE THE HONORABLE MÉLANIE ROY ______________________________________________________________________ [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , in her quality of authorized person by the Director of Youth Protection of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A Applicant -and- X , born on [...], 2002 Child -and- A Mother -and- B Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMEN T Section 95(2) of the Youth Protection Act ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.
Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] The child is 17 years old. She was entrusted to a rehabilitation center according to the last Court order rendered on January 16, 2020. [ 2 ] The Director of Youth Protection (the Director) presents an application for the revision of the last Court order. She alleges that the child’s security and development are no longer in danger. [ 3 ] The parties are in agreement with the Director’s application. [ 4 ] Since the last Court order, the child remained at the Group home A.
Over the weeks, she made very good progress, participating in AA and NA meetings. [ 5 ] In March 2020, due to the Covid-19 Pandemic, the group home closed temporarily. The child was provisionally returned home to her mother with the authorization of the Court. [ 6 ] Since then, she continues to work on relapse prevention with an addiction response worker.
She now hopes to one day become a grief counsellor. [ 7 ] The mother did not report any difficulty nor expressed any concern about the child use of alcohol or drugs. [ 8 ] The Court is therefore satisfied that the evidence demonstrates that the security and development of the child are no longer in danger.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT: [ 9 ] DECLARES that the security and the development of the child are no longer in danger; [ 10 ] ORDERS the closing of the file. __________________________________ Mélanie Roy, J.C.Q. Me Karine Nantais Attorney for the DYP Me Karyn Brown Attorney for the child Date of hearing: May 26, 2020 Judgement signed on: July 6, 2020
Loading document…