2012 QCCQ 18241, 2012 QCCQ 18241

Protection de la jeunesse — 127617 2012 QCCQ 18241 JT 1052 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT [...] LOCALITY […] Youth Division No: 550-41-000611-101 DATE: June 12, 2012 ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HONOURABLE LOUISE TURPIN ______________________________________________________________________ In the case of: X Born […], 1998 ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] The Court is seized of a petition under

section 95 of the Youth Protection Act. [ 2 ] At the beginning of the hearing, the attorney for the Director of the Youth Protection stated that this petition is based on the following motives: ▪ The visits between the mother and the adolescent were to be done at "center A" as per the judgment of February 6 th , 2012; ▪ The organism withdrew their mandate to supervise the visits and it is no longer possible for the visits to occur in the said establishment; ▪ It is in the best interest of the adolescent that the visits with the mother be held in another location; [ 3 ] The Court, with the consent of the youth's attorney, read the following report filed by Me Sandra Couture, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection: D-1 Court Report dated April 30, 2012; [ 4 ] Given the consent of all parties with the social practitioner's recommendations; CONSEQUENTLY THE COURT : DECLARES that the security and development of the youth is still compromise; GRANTS the petition; REVISES the decision rendered February 6 th , 2012; ORDERS that the adolescent remain in his father's care, ORDERS that the visits between the adolescent and his mother be supervised until warranted and that they take place designated by the DYP and in accordance to the mother's personal situation and in the child's best interest; ORDERS that the visits be English speaking; RECOMMENDS that Mrs Lis receives the services that she requires (psychiatric assessment for her mental health, parental abilities, counselling for separation conflict) and she follows the recommendations of the professionals; ORDERS that Mr.

A receives services that he requires (counselling for separation conflict);

ORDERS that the adolescent receives services that he requires (psychosocial follow up); ORDERS that Mrs B will not have violent behaviours or/verbalization towards the centre B worker, the father, his friends, the school and any other persons or place; ORDERS that both parents have to contact the center B worker periodically and inform her of their situation and progress; ORDERS that both parents collaborate with the elaboration and the actualisation of the plan of intervention; RECOMMENDS that the parents actualise the procedures in Superior court regarding the legal custody of the child within the next twelve months; ODERS that a person authorised by the Director of the Youth Protection provide aid, counsel and assistance to the adolescent and the family for nine (9) months; ENTRUSTS the situation of the adolescent to the Director of Youth protection who shall then see that the measures are carried out. __________________________________ LOUISE TURPIN, J.C.Q.

M e Sandra Couture Attorney of the D.P.J. M e Daniel Lessard Attorney of the child M e Anne-France Gagnon Attorney of the father Date of hearing: June 12, 2012