2013 QCCQ 7679, 2013 QCCQ 7679

Protection de la jeunesse — 132795 2013 QCCQ 7679 COURT OF QUÉBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No.: 640-41-001590-139 DATE: June 20, 2013 ______________________________________________________________________ PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X, born on […], 2011 [SOCIAL WORKER 1], youth protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, Quebec, District A Applicant and A, residing and domiciled in City A, Quebec, District A Mother and B, residing and domiciled in City B, Quebec, District A Father ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT (

section 95 ( par. 1) , Youth Protection Act , R.S.Q. , c. P-34.1) ______________________________________________________________________ [ 1 ] Mrs [Social Worker 1], delegate of the Director of Youth Protection A, asks the Court to review the decision rendered on November 1, 2012 concerning the situation of X, 2 years old. She asks for the prolongation of the placement in the foster family for three months with reintegration with the father. [ 2 ] The mother is present at the hearing, assisted by Mtre. Claude Beaudet. Me Daniel Ouellette represents the child and Me Alexandre Cimon the applicant.

The father is absent. [ 3 ] The mother admits as proven all the allegations and agrees with the recommendations of the social worker. The father is in therapy and the mother wishes to attend one soon. The father has his own place and had good parental capacities. He is able to assume the child. [ 4 ] The parents live separately. The mother is now living in City A at her parent's place. Even if ordered, the mother did not attend therapy yet. She is unstable and cannot even be regular in her contacts with the child. She still consumes drugs and alcohol, even knowing she is pregnant.

The mother wishes to attend the A Centre, but up to now, she declined when she had a place available. [ 5 ] The father offers a good collaboration with the social worker. He wants to assume his parental responsibilities and is involved in his child's life. He does not intend to reconcile with the mother.

He knows that X needs a stable and secure environment and he wants to provide her. [ 6 ] Considering the evidence and the agreement of the parties, [ 7 ] Considering that the Director of Youth Protection will take disposition to provide a social follow-up to the mother, [ 8 ] FOR THESE MOTIVES, THE COURT: [ 9 ] GRANTS the petition; [ 10 ] DECLARES that the security and development of X are still in danger; [ 11 ] ORDERS the placement of the child X in a foster family for a period of three months with reintegration with her father; [ 12 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to provide aid, counselling and assistance to the child, her father and her mother for a period of one year;

[ 13 ] ORDERS the Director of Youth Protection to supervise the visit rights and access of the child with her mother (duration, frequency and presence of a third person); [ 14 ] AUTHORIZES the Director of Youth Protection to make unannounced visits at the father's place during and after the child reintegration with him; [ 15 ] ORDERS any police officer to collaborate in the execution of the present judgment; [ 16 ] ENTRUSTS the child's situation to the Director of Youth Protection for the purpose of executing this judgment. __________________________________ DENYSE LEDUC, J.C.Q. Mtre.

Alexandre Cimon, attorney for the applicant Mtre. Claude Beaudet, attorney for the mother Mtre. Daniel Ouellette, attorney for the child Date of hearing: May 29, 2013