2014 QCCQ 17327, 2014 QCCQ 17327

Protection de la jeunesse — 144733 2014 QCCQ 17327 COURT OF QUEBEC CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF [...] TOWN OF [...] Youth Division No: 640-41-001711-149 DATE: September 16, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________ BY THE HONOURABLE JOSÉE BÉLANGER J.C.Q. ______________________________________________________________________ IN THE MATTER OF: X , born […], 2012 [SOCIAL WORKER 1] , Youth Protection worker, duly authorized by the Director of Youth Protection A, working in City A, district A (Quebec) […] Applicant and A , residing and domiciled in City A , district A (Quebec) […] Mother ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ WARNING: The Youth Protection Act forbids the publishing or broadcasting of information allowing for a child or the child’s parents to be identified.

Any person who contravenes this provision commits an offence and is liable to a fine (sections 11.2, 11.2.1 and 135 Y.P.A.). [ 1 ] After the filing of a petition asking the Court to review a decision rendered on March 17, 2014, by Judge Lise Gagnon pursuant to

section 38 of the Youth Protection Act concerning the child, the parties submit to this Court a draft agreement on measures to put an end to this situation. [ 2 ] The mother is present and represented by her lawyer. The child is represented by her lawyer. [ 3 ] The parties acknowledge the facts that still endangered the security or development of the youth and the draft details those facts.

The measures recommended to the Court in order to put an end to that situation are enumerated in the draft agreement filed as an exhibit on D-3. [ 4 ] The consent of the parties was given in a free and enlightened manner and this was verified by the Court with the parties. [ 5 ] The applicant testifies and explains to the Court that he expects to close this file very soon. In order to do so he expects from the mother to remain sober. [ 6 ] The Court is of the opinion that these measures are likely to put an end to the situation in which the security or development of the child is endangered pursuant to the law.

These measures respect the child's best interest. For these reasons the Court: [ 7 ] maintains that the security or development of X, born on [...], 2012, is still compromised pursuant

section 38 of the Youth Protection Act ; [ 8 ] Ratifies the measures enumerated in the draft agreement filed as an exhibit on D-3; [ 9 ] Orders the implementation of these measures; [ 10 ] Entrusts the situation of X to the Director of Youth Protection A for the execution of this judgment. __________________________________ Josée Bélanger, J.C.Q.

Me Camille Provencher, attorney for the Director of Youth Protection Me Joanie Jacob, attorney for the child Me Angèle Tommasel, attorney for the mother Date of hearing: September 4, 2014