JESUS MARTINEZ DE LA CRUZ MIRNA NOEMI MARTINEZ GUTIERREZ JAZMIN ITZEL MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) GRETELL NAOMI MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) MIRNA VIRGINIA MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) Applicants v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP, 2011 FC 259

Federal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20110310 Docket: IMM-2733-10 Citation: 2011 FC 259 Ottawa , Ontario, March 10, 2011 PRESENT: THE CHIEF JUSTICE BETWEEN: JESUS MARTINEZ DE LA CRUZ MIRNA NOEMI MARTINEZ GUTIERREZ JAZMIN ITZEL MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) GRETELL NAOMI MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) MIRNA VIRGINIA MARTINEZ MARTINEZ (MINOR) Applicants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [ 1 ] The tribunal record includes the three personal information forms (PIF) produced for the applicants in December 2008, June 2009 and November 2009. [ 2 ] In dismissing the applicants​ claims, the Refugee Protection Division (the member) relied substantially on the first PIF to demonstrate inconsistencies in the applicants​ version of the relevant events.

The applicants were not questioned by the member about their first narrative. [ 3 ] It was procedurally unfair for the member to ground her reasons for decision on the discrepancies between the first and second PIFs, without raising these inconsistencies during the hearing and affording the claimants the opportunity to provide an explanation. Also, the member​s decision makes no reference to clarifications regarding the first PIF set out in the applicants​ second PIF.

[ 4 ] It is trite law that not every inconsistency must be put to a claimant. Here, however, the inconsistencies were directly related to the member​s negative credibility finding. It was necessary, in the circumstances of this case, for the member to confront the claimants with the first narrative by raising her concerns during the hearing: Kumara v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2010 FC 1172 . The member failed to do so. [ 5 ] Accordingly, this application for judicial review will be granted.

The Court agrees with the parties that this proceeding raises no serious question for certification. JUDGMENT THIS COURT​S JUDGMENT is that this application for judicial review is granted. The decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated April 20, 2010 is set aside and the matter referred for re-determination by a different member. ​Allan Lutfy​ Chief Justice FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2733-10 STYLE OF CAUSE: JESUS MARTINEZ DE LA CRUZ ET AL v.

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: February 15, 2011 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: Lutfy C.J.

DATED: March 10, 2011 APPEARANCES : Alyssa Manning FOR THE APPLICANTS Suran Bhattacharyya FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD : VANDERVENNEN LEHRER Barristers and Solicitors Toronto , Ontario FOR THE APPLICANTS MYLES J. KIRVAN Deputy Attorney General Of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT