RODNEY HERON CANTE HERNANDEZ Applicant v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP, 2013 FC 57

Date: 20130124 Docket: IMM-5898-12 Citation: 2013 FC 57 [UNREVISED ENGLISH CERTIFIED TRANSLATION] Montréal, Quebec, January 24, 2013 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr.

Justice Shore BETWEEN: RODNEY HERON CANTE HERNANDEZ Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [ 1 ] When a refugee claim as a whole makes no sense and the very crux of it has no merit, the claimant’s story itself crumbles. [ 2 ] In response to the application for judicial review, this Court notes that, following a thorough analysis, the contradictions, implausibilities and behaviour of the applicant are entirely inconsistent with his account of the events.

The applicant’s claim escapes any inherent logic and, thus, confirms a lack of credibility. [ 3 ] The applicant, a student at the Technological University of Tlaxcala, Mexico, alleged that he worked in research with one of his fellow students who suggested that they go into business together, using “cactus nopal” in food products, after they won prizes at several science fair exhibitions. [ 4 ] The applicant alleged that the persecuting student wanted to force him to use this intellectual property, in an abusive manner, to create a business. [ 5 ] According to the transcript of the hearing at the Refugee Protection Division (RPD), the applicant was inconsistent with respect to the owner of the research itself, suggesting initially that the university was the owner, then changing his version.

The dates

surrounding the allegations of these events, described by the applicant, were mostly forgotten; but the applicant still remembered the dates surrounding his story very well without remembering the core of the story. The contradictions were pointed out by the RPD. They concern the applicant’s complaint to the authorities, the owner of the intellectual property of the research itself and, also, the details of the university regarding the crux of his refugee claims. [ 6 ] For all the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisses the applicant’s application for judicial review.

JUDGMENT THE COURT ORDERS that the applicant’s application for judicial review be dismissed. There is no question of general importance to certify. “Michel M.J. Shore” Judge Certified true translation Catherine Jones, Translator FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5898-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: RODNEY HERON CANTE HERNANDEZ v MCI PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: January 23, 2013 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: SHORE J.

DATED: January 24, 2013 APPEARANCES : Stewart Istvanffy FOR THE APPLICANT Thomas Cormie FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD : Stewart Istvanffy Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPLICANT William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT