2015 FC, 2015 FC 1104

Date: 20150923 Docket: T-1004-13 Citation: 2015 FC 1104 Toronto, Ontario, September 23, 2015 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Fothergill BETWEEN: TRANS-HIGH CORPORATION Applicant and HIGHTIMES SMOKESHOP AND GIFTS INC. Respondent ORDER AND REASONS I.

Introduction [ 1 ] Trans-High Corporation [the Applicant] has brought an ex parte motion to enforce the Order of this Court dated July 27, 2015 ( Trans-High Corporation v Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc. , 2015 FC 919 ) [the Contempt Order]. [ 2 ] The Applicant asserts that Ontario Corporation No. 1683193, formerly known as Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc. and presently known as Stay High Live High Inc. [the Respondent], and its Officer and Director, Ameen Muhammad (a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad) [Mr.

Muhammad] have breached the terms of the Contempt Order, and asks this Court to impose the additional penalties contemplated in paragraph 5 of the Contempt Order. II. Background [ 3 ] On November 26, 2013, Justice Manson ruled that the Respondent had infringed the Applicant’s " “HIGH TIMES” " trade-mark ( Trans-High Corporation v Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc. , 2013 FC 1190 ). Despite having knowledge of Justice Manson’s judgment, the Respondent continued to use " “HIGH TIMES” " on its shop signage, sales receipts and printed materials. [ 4 ] On June 18, 2015, the Respondent and Mr.

Muhammad each pleaded guilty to five counts of contempt, pursuant to Rule 466 of the Federal Courts Rules , SOR/98-106 [the Rules]. This resulted in the Contempt Order, which provides in material part: 1. The Applicant shall have its costs of the show cause motion before Prothonotary Aalto and the contempt hearing on a solicitor-client basis, fixed in the amount of $62,500, payable by the Respondent Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc. and its Officer and Director, Ameen Muhammad a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad, jointly and severally. 2. Hightimes Smokeshop and Gifts Inc. and Ameen Muhammad a.k.a.

Ameen Mohammad [collectively the Contemnors] shall jointly and severally pay a fine of $50,000. 3.

The payment of the fine ordered in paragraph 2, above, is suspended for a period of 30 days to allow the Contemnors to purge all monetary aspects of their contempt of the order of Justice Manson by making a lump-sum payment of $55,000 owing under that order (representing $25,000 in damages and $30,000 in costs, together with all amounts owing in pre- and post-judgment interest) and the amount of $62,500 in costs as set out in paragraph 1 of this order to the Applicant by way of certified cheque or such other manner of payment 4.

Upon the filing of satisfactory evidence with the Court that such payments have been made within 30 days of the date of this order, the fine otherwise imposed and payable under paragraph 2 shall be reduced to $10,000. 5. In the event that all fines and costs as provided in paragraphs 1 to 3, above, have not been paid within 30 days, Ameen Muhammad a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad is liable to be imprisoned for a period of 14 days and to remain imprisoned until the full amount of the fines and costs is paid. 6.

In the event that the Applicant requires enforcement of paragraph 5 of this order, the Applicant shall be at liberty to seek a warrant of committal from any judge of the Federal Court, on an ex parte basis, and Ameen Muhammad a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad shall, upon the Court finding a breach of one or more of the terms of this order, be committed to jail in accordance with paragraph 5 of this order. [ 5 ] The Contempt Order was sent to counsel for the Respondent, Mr. Alpesh Patel, on the same day that it was issued. Mr.

Patel acknowledged receipt of the Contempt Order. [ 6 ] On July 28, 2015, counsel for the Applicant served Mr. Patel with a formal demand for payment of the amounts owing to the Applicant under the Contempt Order. In that correspondence, counsel for the Applicant indicated that the Applicant required payment of the amounts owing by direct wire transfer to the Applicant’s counsel’s trust account. Mr. Patel acknowledged receipt of this correspondence.

[7] No payment of the amounts owed to the Applicant by the Respondent has been made. Nor has the Respondent paid into Court thefine owing under the Contempt Order. [8] No other communication has been received from the Respondent, Mr. Muhammad or their counsel explaining their refusal to complywith the Contempt Order. III. Issue [9] The sole issue to be determined is whether Mr. Muhammad is liable to be imprisoned, pursuant to Rule 472, for a period of 14 daysand to remain imprisoned until he complies with paragraphs 1 to 3 of the Contempt Order, as prescribed by paragraph 5 of ContemptOrder. IV.

Analysis [10] A person who is ordered by a court to pay money to another cannot be imprisoned for contempt if he or she is unable to pay thedebt (Vidéotron Ltée v Industries Microlec produits électriques Inc, (SCC), [1992] 2 SCR 1065 [Vidéotron] at 1078).

AsJustice Binnie held in R v Wu, 2003 SCC 73 , [2003] 3 SCR 530 [Wu] at para 2, "“[d]ebtors’ prison for impoverished people is aDickensian concept that in civilized countries has largely been abolished.” "This is consistent with s 56(2) of the Federal Courts Act,RSC, 1985, c F-7, which states that no person shall be taken into custody under process of execution for debt issued out of the FederalCourt. [11] However, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a person who is ordered by a court to pay money may be imprisoned forcontempt if he or she shows "“a certain degree of intention to evade his or her obligations”"; that is, if he or she is unwilling to pay thedebt despite having the ability to pay (Canada (Attorney General) v United States Steel Corporation, 2011 FCA 176 [US Steel] at para63, citing Vidéotron at 1078). [12] In this case, I am satisfied that the Respondent and Mr.

Muhammad are able but unwilling to pay the fines, costs, and other amountsimposed by Justice Manson’s November 26, 2013 judgment and the Contempt Order. Taking into account the Applicant’s repeatedoffers of leniency, the Respondent’s undertaking to pay in February, 2015, and the guilty pleas entered on June 18, 2015, I am left in nodoubt that the Respondent and Mr. Muhammad are refusing to pay the amounts owed under the Contempt Order.

They have hadnumerous opportunities to offer an explanation for their failure to pay, or to demonstrate an inability to pay, and they have not done so.Since the commencement of these proceedings, the Respondent and Mr. Muhammad have exhibited a brazen indifference towards therights of the Applicants and the authority of this Court. [13] The primary purposes of sanctions for contempt are to ensure compliance with court orders and to maintain public confidence inthe administration of justice (Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Marshall, 2006 FC 788 at para 16).

In keeping with paragraph 6of the Contempt Order, the additional penalties contemplated in paragraph 5 of the Contempt Order must now be enforced in order tocompel compliance with this Court’s Orders and to deter other similar conduct. Mr. Muhammad is not subject to imprisonment as aresult of the unpaid debt, but rather for his deliberate refusal to comply with the Contempt Order despite his ability to do so (US Steel atparas 64, 71). [14] The Applicant’s motion for a warrant of committal, issued pursuant to Rule 471, is therefore granted (Minister of National Revenuev Middleton, 2007 FC 1269 at para 11). V.

Costs [15] The Applicant seeks its costs of the motion on a solicitor-client basis. The Applicant submits that the further costs anddisbursements since the date of the contempt hearing, including preparation for and attendance on this motion, total $4,000. [16] It is customary practice in contempt cases to impose costs on a solicitor-client basis (Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency v U-Compute, 2007 FCA 127 at para 38). Costs are therefore awarded to the Applicant on a solicitor-client basis and are fixed in the amountof $4,000. ORDER THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1.

A warrant of committal shall be issued for Ameen Muhammad a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad, who shall be arrested and imprisonedfor a period of not less than 14 days and remain imprisoned until the full amounts of all fines, costs, and other amounts owingunder the Contempt Order and the judgment of Justice Manson dated November 26, 2013 have been paid. 2. 2. The Applicant shall have its costs of this motion on a solicitor-client basis, fixed in the amount of $4,000, payable by theRespondent and its Officer and Director, Ameen Muhammad a.k.a. Ameen Mohammad, jointly and severally. 3. 3.

Upon the filing of satisfactory evidence with the Court that the full amounts of all fines, costs, and other amounts owing underthe Contempt Order and the judgment of Justice Manson dated November 26, 2013 have been paid, Ameen Muhammad a.k.a.Ameen Mohammad shall be at liberty to apply for an Order for his release.

4 . 4. This Court shall remain seized of this matter to address any issue arising from the terms of this Order. "Simon Fothergill" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1004-13 STYLE OF CAUSE: TRANS-HIGH CORPORATION v HIGHTIMES SMOKESHOP AND GIFTS INC. PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, ONtario DATE OF HEARING: September 16, 2015 ORDER AND REASONS: Fothergill J. DATED: september 23, 2015 APPEARANCES : Kevin Sartorio James Green For The APPLICANT No Appearance FOR THE respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD : Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Toronto, Ontario For The applicant AP LAW Toronto, Ontario FOR THE respondent