Date: 20120910 Docket: A-473-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 232 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: ELI LILLY CANADA INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED and ELI LILLY SA Appellants And NOVOPHARM LIMITED Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20120910 Docket: A-473-11 Citation: 2012 FCA 232 CORAM: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A.

TRUDEL J.A. BETWEEN: ELI LILLY CANADA INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED and ELI LILLY SA Appellants And NOVOPHARM LIMITED Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on September 10, 2012) [ 1 ] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the appellant, we have not been persuaded that the judgment under appeal is based on any error of law or principle or any palpable and overriding error of fact. [ 2 ] This appeal will be dismissed with costs. “M. Nadon” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET: A-473-11 STYLE OF CAUSE: Eli Lilly Canada Inc. & al v. Novopharm Limited PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: September 10, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. SHARLOW J.A. TRUDEL J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A. APPEARANCES : Anthony G. Creber Cristin A. Wagner Livia Aumand FOR THE APPELLANTS Jonathan Stainsby Andrew Skodyn Neil Fineberg FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD : Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANTS

Heenan Blaikie LLP Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT