Date: 20141105 Docket: A-267-14 Citation: 2014 FCA 259 CORAM: NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A. BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT Respondent Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: BOIVIN J.A. Date: 20141105 Docket: A-267-14 Citation: 2014 FCA 259 CORAM: NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A.

BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Applicant and ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on November 5, 2014). BOIVIN J.A. [ 1 ] Despite the forceful argument of counsel for the applicant, we have not been persuaded that the Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal committed a reviewable error. [ 2 ] It was open to the Tribunal to conclude as it did, on the basis of the evidence on record. What we are being asked to do is to conduct a trial de novo and reach the opposite conclusion.

This is not the role of this Court. [ 3 ] The application for judicial review will be dismissed. “ Richard Boivin ” J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-267-14 STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. ANTHONY SCHOOLCRAFT PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: November 5, 2014 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL C.J. GAUTHIER J.A. BOIVIN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: BOIVIN J.A. APPEARANCES : Dominique Guimond For The Applicant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA SOLICITORS OF RECORD : William F. Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For The Applicant ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA