Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 [ENGLISH TRANSLATION] CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. BETWEEN:SOPHIE NADEAUApplicantandCANADA REVENUE AGENCYRespondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. Judgment delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. Date: 20181120 Docket: A-325-17 Citation: 2018 FCA 214 CORAM: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A.

BETWEEN:SOPHIE NADEAUApplicantandCANADA REVENUE AGENCYRespondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 20, 2018.) NADON J.A. [1] Considering that the reasonableness standard is the applicable standard in this case, we are of the view that intervention isunwarranted. [2] In other words, the applicant failed to demonstrate the unreasonableness of the September 26, 2017 decision by the Federal PublicSector Labour Relations and Employment Board (2017 PSLREB 27 , 2017 FPSLREB 27) dismissing the grievance that she hadfiled against her employer alleging that the employer had breached its duty to accommodate and had discriminated against her bychanging her employment status from full-time to part-time.

[ 3 ] Therefore, the application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $2,500.00, inclusive of taxes and disbursements. “M Nadon” J.A. Certified true translation Janine Anderson, Revisor FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: A-325-17 STYLE OF CAUSE: SOPHIE NADEAU v. CANADA REVENUE AGENCY PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: November 20, 2018 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A. GLEASON J.A. RIVOALEN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES : Jean-Michel Corbeil For the Applicant Pierre-Marc Champagne For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD : GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP Ottawa, Ontario For the Applicant Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario For the Respondent