2021 MBCA 90, 2021 MBCA 90
Opinion
Citation: Kuny v Pullan Kammerloch Frohlinger et al, Date: 20211029 2021 MBCA 90 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Coram: Madam Justice Holly C. Beard Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner Docket: AI20-30-09529 ) BETWEEN : ) ) DOUGLAS J. KUNY ) ) (Plaintiff) Appellant ) ) D. J. Kuny - and - ) on his own behalf ) PULLAN KAMMERLOCH FROHLINGER ) ) (Defendant) Respondent ) K. J. Ferbers and ) A. J. Meyers - and - ) for the Respondents ) Docket: AI20-30-09530 ) BETWEEN : ) ) Appeals heard and DOUGLAS J.
KUNY ) Decision pronounced: ) October 29, 2021 (Plaintiff) Appellant ) ) - and - ) ) PITBLADO LLP ) ) (Defendant) Respondent ) On appeal from 2020 MBQB 14 mainella JA (for the Court) : [ 1 ] These appeals by the plaintiff arise from two orders granting
summary judgment dismissing two separate claims of professional negligence and misconduct made against two law firms who represented the plaintiff at different times in appealing decisions of the Discipline Committee Panel of the College of Registered Nurses of Manitoba. [ 2 ] In each appeal, the plaintiff essentially makes two arguments: (1) the motion judge erred in granting
summary judgment to dismiss his claim, and (2) the motion judge demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of bias against him. [ 3 ] In our view, there is no merit to either appeal whatsoever. Accordingly, in the result, both appeals are dismissed with costs.
JA JA JA
Loading document…