R. v. Guilbault, 2010 NSCA 102
Opinion
NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: R. v. Guilbault , 2010 NSCA 102 Date: 20101209 Docket: CAC 325298 Registry: Halifax Between: Patrick Guilbault Appellant v. Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Judges: MacDonald, C.J.N.S.; Saunders and Bryson, JJ.A. Appeal Heard: December 9, 2010, in Halifax, Nova Scotia Written Judgment: December 9, 2010 Held: Leave to appeal is granted but the appeal is dismissed per oral reasons for judgment of Saunders, J.A.; MacDonald, C.J.N.S. and Bryson, J.A. concurring. Counsel: Darren MacLeod, for the appellant Daniel MacRury, Q.C., for the respondent Reasons for judgment : [ 1 ] Despite the able arguments of counsel for the appellant, we are not persuaded that the
summary conviction appeal court (SCAC) erred in affirming the decision of the trial judge who convicted the appellant of operating a motor vehicle while disqualified contrary to s. 259(4) (
b) of the Criminal Code . [ 2 ] In order for this appeal to succeed an error of law must be apparent in the reasons of Farrar, J. (as he then was) sitting as the SCAC. See R. v. R.H.L. , 2008 NSCA 100 . [ 3 ] We are unanimously of the view that no such error occurred. While we would grant leave to appeal, the appeal is dismissed.
Saunders, J.A. Concurred in: MacDonald, C.J.N.S. Bryson, J.A.
Loading document…