2013 ONSC 2586, 2013 ONSC 2586
Opinion
CITATION : Wilson et al v. RIU et al, 2013 ONSC 2586 COURT FILE NO.: 10-24512 DATE: 2013-04-30 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: Donald Wilson and Tammy Papetti, Plaintiffs AND: RIU and RIU Hotels et al, Defendants BEFORE: The Honourable Mr. Justice D.A. Broad COUNSEL: Plaintiffs Self-Represented but not in attendance John A. Olah, for the RIU Defendants Jamie A. Macdonald, for the Thomas Cook Defendants Robert L.
Love, for the Chukka Defendants ADDENDUM TO COSTS ENDORSEMENT DATED JANUARY 25, 2013 [ 1 ] Counsel for the Chukka Defendants (namely Chukka Caribbean Adventures Limited and Chukka Caribbean Adventures) has brought to my attention a calculation error with respect to the amount to be awarded to those defendants in respect of the jurisdictional motion. In the Costs Endorsement at paragraph 12, I ruled that each of the moving defendants would be allowed their full time for the motion, at the adjusted hourly rates set forth in paragraph 10, being $225.00 for Mr.
Love, senior counsel for the Chukka Defendants, and $150.00 for junior counsel. [ 2 ] The Bill of Costs of the Chukka Defendants provided for 28 hours for Mr. Love and 28.8 hours for junior counsel for the jurisdictional motion. At the adjusted hourly rates indicated, an amount of $10,620.00 would be allowed to those defendants for the jurisdictional motion.
The revised total for the Chukka Defendants would therefore be $19,150.60, inclusive of HST and disbursements. [ 3 ] I have now signed the Judgment providing for the stay of the action as against the moving defendants and for costs in accordance with the Costs Endorsement dated January 25, 2013, as revised by this Addendum. As the Plaintiffs were not represented at the hearing, their approval of the Judgment is not required pursuant to Rule 59.03. ___________________________
D.A. Broad J. DATE: April 30, 2013
Loading document…