) ) AMIN HADJ LOU Plaintiff/Respondent – v. –, 2017 ONSC 2992

CITATION : Lou v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONSC 2992 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 204/17 DATE: 20170515 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT BETWEEN: ) ) AMIN HADJ LOU Plaintiff/Respondent – and – THE CITY OF TORONTO Defendant/Moving Party ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Amin Hadj Lou, acting in person Jared Wehrle , for the Defendant/Moving Party ) ) HEARD at Toronto: May 15, 2017 corbett J. ( Orally ) [ 1 ] Toronto seeks an order extending the time to appeal an order of Deputy Judge De Lucia dismissing a motion for

summary judgment. Toronto satisfies all aspect of the test for an extension except for one: the appeal is patently without merit. The impugned decision is clearly interlocutory. It does not finally dispose of any issue in the case and is not binding on the trial judge (including any findings made about the extent of privilege and any “immunity” the City may have. There are no appeals from interlocutory decisions of the Small Claims Court. This prohibition is absolute. The motion is dismissed.

Nominal costs to the respondent fixed at $100 inclusive payable within 30 days by the City. ___________________________ Corbett J. Date of Reasons for Judgment: May 15, 2017 Date of Release: May 15, 2017 CITATION : Lou v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONSC 2992 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 204/17 DATE: 20170515

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT BETWEEN: AMIN HADJ LOU Plaintiff/Respondent – and – THE CITY OF TORONTO Defendant/Moving Party ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT corbett J . Date of Reasons for Judgment: May 15, 2017 Date of Release: May 15, 2017