E.A.G. Plaintiff AND: D.L.G. Defendant, 2012 YKSC 38

SUPREME COURT OF YUKON Citation: E.A.G. v. D.L.G., 2012 YKSC 38 Date: 20120515 Docket S.C. No.: 09-D4166 Registry: Whitehorse BETWEEN: E.A.G. Plaintiff AND: D.L.G. Defendant Before: Mr. Justice R.S. Veale Appearances: Debbie Hoffman Lynsey Mincher Counsel for the Plaintiff Agent for Counsel for the Defendant REASONS FOR JUDGMENT DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH [ 1 ] VEALE J. (Oral): There are two issues before me which, I take it, counsel, want a decision. One is the issue of whether the unsupervised access is at the daycare, and I have indicated that fairly clearly at this point.

The access is at the daycare and it is unsupervised, but it is at the daycare, and that, as I understand it, is inside the daycare with respect to any play area that is concerned. [ 2 ] The second issue is the issue of Ms. Laird seeing the children for one hour, which I understand is taking place on Tuesdays, and the children are delivered from the school to Ms. Laird’s. As I understand it, the delivery from the school would be from the pick-up at 3:10, dropped off at Ms. Laird’s at 3:30. They would be finished by 4:30.

I am going to order that that continue, but that D.L.G. can do the pick-up from school and the delivery to Ms. Laird, and the pick-up from Ms. Laird and the return to the daycare that day. [ 3 ] Is there anything that is unclear about that? [ 4 ] MS. HOFFMAN: No, just to confirm that it’s otherwise, other than Tuesdays, that it’s 3:30 until five o’clock, that that should form part of the order and that -- [ 5 ] THE COURT: I think you should set it all out in the order to consolidate to that extent. ________________________________ VEALE J.