VILLANUEVA v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, 240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702

VILLANUEVA v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY S252035 Supreme Court of California. DECEMBER 12, 2018 The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are:

(1) Insurance Code

section 12414.26 provides: "No act done, action taken, or agreement made pursuant to the authority conferred by

Article 5.5 (commencing with

Section 12401) or

Article 5.7 (commencing with

Section 12402) of this

chapter shall constitute a violation of or grounds for prosecution or civil proceedings under any other law of this state heretofore or hereafter enacted which does not specifically refer to insurance." Does this statute provide immunity to an underwritten title company for charging consumers for services for which there have been no rate filings with the Insurance Commissioner? Stated otherwise, by charging unfiled rates, did Fidelity act "pursuant to the authority conferred by

Article 5.5"?

(2) Does the Insurance Commissioner have exclusive jurisdiction over any action against an underwritten title company for services charged to the consumer, but not disclosed to the Department of Insurance? The requests for depublication are denied. Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar and Kruger, JJ.