CaseLiteby Caseway
Search

California Rules of Court

Updated 2026-08-04 · 438 documents

Browse alphabetically

All0–9ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
TitleCitationDate
Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Jason Anderson, District Attorney, and Brent J. Schultze, Deputy District Attorney for Real Party in Interest. In Yedinak v. Superior Court (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 876 (Yedinak), we outlined the requirements a trial court must follow before denying a — Court of Appeal Opinionc7a5d53775e43655d6d9976e78380d2b1992abe0—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD — Court of Appeal Opinion (F087362)F087362—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THOR MOTOR COACH, Inc., et al. — Court of Appeal Opinion (B339037)B339037—
California Rules of Court — Rule 4.105 — Appearance without deposit of bail in traffic infraction cases 1 2 (a) Application 3 4 This rule applies to any traffic infraction violation of the Vehicle Code for which 5 the defendant has received a written notice to appear. 6 7 (Subd (a) amended effective December 1, 2015.) 8 9 (b) * * * 10 11 (c) Deposit of bail 12 13 (1) Courts must require the deposit of bail when the defendant elects a statutory 14 procedure that requires the deposit of bail;. 15 16 (2) Courts may require the deposit of bail when the defendant does not sign a 17 written promise to appear as required by the court; and. 18 19 (3) Courts may require a deposit of bail before trial if the court finds, based on 20 the circumstances of a particular case, that the defendant is unlikely to appear 21 as ordered without a deposit of bail and the court expressly states the reasons 22 for the finding. 23 24 (4) In determining the amount of bail set under (2) and (3), courts must consider 25 the totality of the circumstances. 26 27 (Subd (c) amended effective December 1, 2015.) 28 29 (d) Notice 30 31 Courts must inform defendants of the option to appear in court without the deposit 32 of bail in any instructions or other materials courts provide for the public that relate 33 to bail for traffic infractions, including any website information, written 34 instructions, courtesy notices, and forms. Courts must implement this subdivision 35 as soon as reasonably possible but no later than September 15, 2015. 36 37 (Subd (d) amended effective December 1, 2015.) 38 39 Rule 4.105 amended effective December 1, 2015; adopted effective June 8, 2015. 40 41 (effective on December 1, 2015 Rule 4)Cal. R. Ct. 4.105—
= h v h ~ w ~ _ n h t = p 1 t p = — d t 1 h h p m / — i p h h n — d t h p / h 0 h h h p = — h / — h — D a 0 = 0 = p — 2 — a p = / — h p ‘ p h / p /CCC-087533—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ISAIAS DEJESUS VALENCIA — Court of Appeal Opinion (B338672)B338672—
BOF 1023 (Rev. 01/2026) PAGE 1 of 1e646cbd30ccd3afa7e2bc46221bbd1c435369bee—
Twelve Point Pension Reform PlanCCC-239958—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 5.663—
BOF 1026 (Rev. 01/2026)4321c689cc854da37fdad1cf3ff7633f8adfa66f—
California Rules of Court — Rule 2.250 — Construction and definitions (effective January 1, 2018 Rule 2)Cal. R. Ct. 2.250—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES — Court of Appeal Opinion (B340105)B340105—
California Rules of Court — Rule 8.1105 — Publication of appellate opinions 11 12 (a) - (d) * * * 13 14 (e) Changes in publication status 15 16 (1) Unless otherwise ordered under (2),: 17 18 (A) An opinion is no longer considered published if the Supreme Court grants 19 review or the rendering court grants rehearing. 20 21 (B) Grant of review by the Supreme Court of a decision by the Court of Appeal 22 does not affect the appellate court’s certification of the opinion for full or 23 partial publication under rule 8.1105(b) or rule 8.1110, but any such Court of 24 Appeal opinion, whether officially published in hard copy or electronically, 25 must be accompanied by a prominent notation advising that review by the 26 Supreme Court has been granted. 27 28 (2) The Supreme Court may order that an opinion certified for publication is not to be 29 published or that an opinion not certified is to be published. The Supreme Court 30 may also order depublication of part of an opinion in whole or in part, at any time 31 after granting review. 32 33 (f) * * * 34 35 Advisory Committee Comment 36 37 Subdivision (e)(2). This subdivision allows the Supreme Court to order depublication of an opinion that 38 is under review by that court. 39 40 41 Rule 8.1115. Citation of opinions 42 43 (a) - (b) * * * 44 45 46Cal. R. Ct. 8.1105—
Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ — Court of Appeal Opinion (B344044)B344044—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT DUENAS — Court of Appeal Opinion (B335274)B335274—
α. Old English bisignisse (Northumbrian, accusative), Middle English bessynes, Middle English besynese, Middle English beysones, Middle English bisenes,CCC-266254—
BOF 1022 (Rev. 01/2026)0fe6fb10f6692107a48c425e5cf1dcc5d7fdce33—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 3.1162—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JERMAINE JEREMIAH BRIM — Court of Appeal Opinion2d3eb0a1c9b8fea658c29dafb21ad1a7c19a7d0a—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CUAUHTEMOC MENDEZ LOPEZ — Court of Appeal Opinion (B341617)B341617—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL KRAUSE — Court of Appeal Opinionb3073528ac9f7a75eb6e0b13bb01ef4476a85168—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. D.A. — Court of Appeal Opinion1187ba3417a279cca131ff1b1533094830b2ffa0—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective January 22, 2024)037d498194fa188206e1739eed2def135c8fbf2e—
DEPARTAMENTO DE JUSTICIA DE CALIFORNIA1acc264824af9bba98521762270e2f4c27ab5503—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MICHAEL S. BRADBURY et al. — Court of Appeal Opinion1926d296e22adce4c5fada5481ad4440b34a223c—
California Department ofCCC-277072—
California Rules of Court — Rule 4.540 — Revocation of postrelease community supervision (effective on October 28, 2011 Rule 4)Cal. R. Ct. 4.540—
California Rules of Court — Rule 2.257 — Requirements for signatures on documents (effective on July 1, 2016 Rule 2)Cal. R. Ct. 2.257—
California Rules of Professional ConductCCC-232946—
ADMINISTRATIVE ODER 2025-10-22-01ee9478fcbc864a459b9ebbfc4a2dcf49477fa403—
Am.J.Hum.Genet.59:497-500,1996CCC-093944—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.804 — Superior court financial policies and procedures 1 2 (a) Adoption of financial policies and procedures by the Judicial Council 3 4 As part of its responsibility for regulating the budget and fiscal management of the 5 trial courts, the Judicial Council adopts Tthe Trial Court Financial Policies and 6 Procedures Manual. The manual contains regulations establishing budget 7 procedures, recordkeeping, must be consistent with the rules of court and policies 8 adopted by the Judicial Council and must include accounting standards, and other 9 financial guidelines for superior courts. and policies and procedures for 10 procurement and contracting by superior courts. These policies and procedures 11 must not modify superior courts’ existing authority to procure, contract for, or use 12 goods or services or the requirement that a court have authorized funding available 13 in order to procure or contract for any good or service. The manual sets out a 14 system of fundamental internal controls that will enable the trial courts to monitor 15 their use of public funds, provide consistent and comparable financial statements, 16 and demonstrate accountability. 17 18 (Subd (a) amended effective August 26, 2016; previously amended effective January 1, 19 2007, and July 1, 2015.) 20 21 (b) Amendments Comment period for financial policies and procedures 22 23 (1) Before amending making any substantive amendments to the Trial Court 24 Financial Policies and Procedures Manual, the Judicial Council must make 25 it the amendments available to the superior courts, the California Department 26 of Finance, and the State Controller’s Office for 30 days for comment. 27 28 (2) The Judicial Council delegates to the Administrative Director, under 29 article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution and other applicable law, 30 the authority to make technical changes and clarifications to the manual, 31 provided the changes and clarifications are consisCal. R. Ct. 10.804—
Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. HARESH JOGANI et al. — Court of Appeal Opinion (B338590)B338590—
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIAe14682ee2b3690dbc4a4687ff3526348d319bde6—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DERRICK LAMONT BROWN — Court of Appeal Opinion (B337987)B337987—
Federal Judge Orders Alameda County District Attorney to Review 35 Capital Cases Following Disclosure of ProsecutorialCCC-087560—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. — Court of Appeal Opinion (B346662)B346662—
Petitioners, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and KIN CHAN — Court of Appeal Opinioncc17da0848fb91b28ffa0fab137b7f266dd5e8c7—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES — Court of Appeal Opinionfdf7b50eec534a484eeade86c85781b10a9bf1c6—
California Rules of Court — Rule 4.411 — Presentence investigations and reports (effective on January 1, 2015 Rule 4)Cal. R. Ct. 4.411—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective September 1, 2024)14e02129326932df42982876c45edc2a60e0e24a—
Petitioner and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES — Court of Appeal Opinionf9abcef4e3d462fbf8fe2a0074ddc484eb5b3583—
California Rules of Court — Rule 4.116 — Certification to juvenile court (effective May 22, 2017 Rule 4)Cal. R. Ct. 4.116—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 3—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AARON SIMPSON et al. — Court of Appeal Opinione452d4ce3da1d2337cf959c43ad728fe4090c202—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM EUGENE SALSTROM — Court of Appeal Opinion72d7561252023cf684aed1b72f8cf17cb1b7354f—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.603 — Authority and duties of presiding judge 1 2 (a)–(b) * * * 3 4 (c) Duties 5 6 (1)–(2) * * * 7 8 (3) Submitted cases 9 10 The presiding judge must supervise and monitor the number of causes under 11 submission before the judges of the court and ensure that no cause under 12 submission remains undecided and pending for longer than 90 days. As an 13 aid in accomplishing this goal, the presiding judge must: 14 15 (A)–(E) * * * 16 17 (F) Consider requesting the services of the Administrative Office of the 18 Courts Judicial Council staff to review the court’s calendar 19 management procedures and make recommendations whenever either 20 of the following condition exists in the court for the most recent three 21 months: 22 23 (i)–(ii) * * * 24 25 (4) Oversight of judicial officers 26 27 The presiding judge must: 28 29 (A)–(B) * * * 30 31 (C) Commissioners 32 33 (i) Prepare and submit to the judges for consideration and adoption 34 procedures for receiving, inquiring into, and resolving complaints 35 lodged against court commissioners and referees subordinate 36 judicial officers, consistent with rule 10.703; and 37 38 (ii) Notify the Commission on Judicial Performance if a 39 commissioner or referee subordinate judicial officer is disciplined 40 or resigns, consistent with rule 10.703(k)(j). 41 (effective on January 1, 2016 Rule 10)Cal. R. Ct. 10.603—
California Rules of Court — Rule 1.21 — ServiceCal. R. Ct. 1.21—
Appendix B of the California Rules of Court is amended, effective July 1, 2021, to read:5e5ba6ee7f97f7edd5b48dd467ce31bd09c1b469—
California Rules of Court — Rule 2.3 — Definitions (effective on January 1, 2016, and July 1, 2016 1 Rule 2)Cal. R. Ct. 2.3—
← Previous pagePage 2 of 9 · 438 documentsNext page →

About this database — California Rules of Court

California primary law. Statutes/codes and bills live in LegInfo bulk on disk; regulations (CCR) are not available from a free official scrape (Westlaw-gated).