CaseLiteby Caseway
Search

California Rules of Court

Updated 2026-08-04 · 438 documents

Browse alphabetically

All0–9ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
TitleCitationDate
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective January 1, 2026)48611523a8284259c6bacd2c7ec9acb116e551c6—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.660 — Enforcement of agreements—petitions (Gov. Code, §§ 71639.5, 71825.2) (effective on October 24, 2008, January 1, 2009, and July 1, 2009)Cal. R. Ct. 10.660—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LESTER MCDOUGHTERY — Court of Appeal Opinion (B340166)B340166—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL — Court of Appeal Opinione4279b4803e96bfeeb5f5544879404c5f2fdd6c2—
California Rules of Court — Rule 1.3 — Authority (effective on January 1, 2008)Cal. R. Ct. 1.3—
California Rules of Court — Rule 2.893 — Appointment of interpreters in court proceedings (effective January 1, 2018 Rule 2)Cal. R. Ct. 2.893—
Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION — Court of Appeal Opinion7621d72c290c2d1171f6aa8bf34d892d5a54d716—
California Rules of Court — Rule 5.118 — Application for court order Declarations supporting and responding to a 1 request for court order (effective on July 1, 2012 7 Rule 5)Cal. R. Ct. 5.118—
e & i \ — = i | — | — — = | — = — — = — — = — = — — a — — — — = — — — — — — = | — = — — — | i — — | — — = | — — — i — — | i — = — — — i | — — — — = a — | — = i | — | — — = | — = — a — — — — — — — = — — = | — — = — | — — | — — = — —CCC-281977—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE COFER — Court of Appeal Opinion030c0efd7ed4bba0c68bf43a470e85e0c0ab8d8d—
Form Approved for Optional UseCCC-255262—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.502 — Judicial sabbatical pilot program (effective July 23, 2018 Rule 10)Cal. R. Ct. 10.502—
California Rules of Court — Rule 1 — Unlawful deta iners 4 5 (a) Application 6 7 Notwithstanding any other law, including Code of Civil Procedure sections 1166, 8 1167, 1169, and 1170.5, this rule applies to all actions for unlawful detainer. 9 10 (b) Issuance of s ummons 11 12 A court may not issue a summons on a complaint for unlawful detainer unless the 13 court finds, in its discretion and on the record, that the action is necessary to protect 14 public health and safety. 15 16 (c) Entry of default 17 18 A court may not enter a default or a default judgment for restitution in an unlawful 19 detainer action for failure of defendant to appear unless the court finds both of the 20 following: 21 22 (1) The action is necessary to protect public health and safety; and 23 24 (2) The defendant has not appeared in the action within the time provided by 25 law, including by any applicable executive order. 26 27 (d) Time for trial 28 29 If a defendant has appeared in the action, the court may not set a trial date earlier 30 than 60 days after a request for trial is made unless the court finds that an earlier 31 trial date is necessary to protect public health and safety. Any trial set in an 32 unlawful detainer proceeding as of April 6, 2020 must be continued at least 60 days 33 from the initial date of trial. 34 35 (e ) Sunset of rule 36 37 This rule will remain in effect until 90 days after the Governor declares that the 38 state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic is lifted, or until amended or 39 repealed by the Judicial Council. 40 41 42 (effective April 6, 2020 15 Appendix I 1 2 3 Eme rge ncy rule 1)Cal. R. Ct. 1—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JACOB TIMOTHY LAGARDE — Court of Appeal Opinion (B342370)B342370—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.14 — Litigation Management Committee (effective on December 9, 2008)Cal. R. Ct. 10.14—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective February 22, 2025)b0438e0d1b5809b7134f96dd32a97113ac15121f—
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = — = — = = = = = = = = = = = = = = — = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = —CCC-251135—
KFF Health Tracking Poll – June 2020 – Racism, Protests, and Racial Disparities – 9491 | KFF1da438c517683d45d8a291fb6a6c8915c72d19d3—
California Rules of Court — Rule 3.36 — Notice of limited scope representation and application to be relieved as 1 attorney (effective September 1, 2018 Rule 3)Cal. R. Ct. 3.36—
Coronavirus outbreakCCC-241431—
feeling, n. : Oxford English DictionaryCCC-086234—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAUL OSUNA — Court of Appeal Opinion (B340274)B340274—
SDSC ADM-317 (New 9/12) POLICY REGARDING NORMAL AVAILABILITYCCC-230899—
California Coastal Commission Document 277487CCC-277487—
California Rules of Court — Rule 1.6 — Definitions and use of terms (effective on January 1, 2014, and March 1, 2014 1 Rules effective January 1, 2014: Rule 1)Cal. R. Ct. 1.6—
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATIONCCC-280000—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PHILLIP MAURICE BRISSETTE — Court of Appeal Opinion (B338984)B338984—
8/17/2020 Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in California announces opening date | The Sacramento BeeCCC-238544—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAEL, INC. — Court of Appeal Opinion2ec9a961f5871bd0311a7c9da739c7968307094e—
COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATESCCC-239907—
Ab>Ui.C‘1>niI.AbS3ni33iSt.yni.NI‘>>1.DiSIii1in3.-.C‘CCCCC-242494—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective July 15, 2024)26828a2f19a26f2cbade8cb19f61e79ad0b69944—
Rule 10.174. Petition Regarding Disputes Related to Court Security Memoranda of 1Cal. R. Ct. 10.174—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEREK J. GUTIERREZ — Court of Appeal Opinion17ca4e7ee6213e140fbbb65026838f527cc7a63e—
Severe Mental IllnessCCC-092615—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION et al. — Court of Appeal Opinionda9ba178aa269dd6f78962c31f259f2e9e47139e—
California Rules of Court — Rule 12 — Electronic service (effective April 17, 2020 Emergency rule 12)Cal. R. Ct. 12—
Pretrial Detention and Jail Capacity in CaliforniaCCC-247278—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective April 28, 2025)308247b38267c02b721e544d2f0dd24b2c8b250b—
Incommode | Definition of Incommode by Merriam-WebsterCCC-238001—
Home > article > CPRAs re: DA Compliance with Batson & Wheeler MandatesCCC-175660—
Commission Determination of Applicable Hearing and Notice Provisions (pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 13569) for the issuance of two Certificates of Compliance to Albert Schoenfield for one acre and 3CCC-284378—
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2026-03-18d17c92a8a8b76e77202edd489190d8c2032a11bd—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 9.11—
The California Rules of Court, rules 1.4, 3.712, and 3.720 are amended, effective February 26,Cal. R. Ct. 1.4—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LANDU MICHAEL MVUEMBA — Court of Appeal Opinion (B342855)B342855—
CALIFORNIA CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS 1825180c1ff5abeaf72f2ad8ebf362590c95784c1—
California Rules of Court — Rule 229 — Proposed jury instructionsCal. R. Ct. 229—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF OAKLAND — Court of Appeal Opinion81706c664ee9bd143f3bfde71ddb618d3017c32f—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCRC amend. September 19, 2023—
← Previous pagePage 8 of 9 · 438 documentsNext page →

About this database — California Rules of Court

California primary law. Statutes/codes and bills live in LegInfo bulk on disk; regulations (CCR) are not available from a free official scrape (Westlaw-gated).