CaseLiteby Caseway
Search

California Rules of Court

Updated 2026-08-04 · 438 documents

Browse alphabetically

All0–9ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
TitleCitationDate
Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY — Court of Appeal Opinioncb8feb7ae361ef9a09c20956838c1e1f02714dd7—
Rule 3.1015. Discovery in action pending outside of California 1Cal. R. Ct. 3.1015—
Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY — Court of Appeal Opinion286944018363b1a77ef1fa1413a6f705d90b4b4d—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PERRIE THOMPSON — Court of Appeal Opinion (B333097)B333097—
California Coastal Commission Document 275272CCC-275272—
"In view of recent events in our communities and through the nation, we are at an inflection point in our history.CCC-250734—
A l a r g e - s c a l e a n a l y s i s o f r a c i a l d i s p a r i t i e sCCC-126560—
Arnold Schwarzenegger, GovernorCCC-253458—
Duty to Report Suspected Child Abuse UnderCCC-240156—
Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MARYSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — Court of Appeal Opinion46e168b5236c49a7ca5c2c49c22e9ede2ef75095—
Habeas Corpus Resource CenterCCC-118775—
https://www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/ihss/program-dataCCC-249593—
2020 Identity Theft Statistics | ConsumerAffairsCCC-249397—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER FRANCIS MUSSELMAN — Court of Appeal Opinion (B342372)B342372—
Controlling Your Visibility | Instagram Help CenterCCC-230051—
Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. XINHUI DENG et al. — Court of Appeal Opinion2805f66fe6382c8db780cc5d856512da37e9a7fe—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A.J. — Court of Appeal Opinion22ea85db942d13766429d7cdd6542f044ca691f0—
expanded; expanding; expandsCCC-287414—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.64 — Trial Court Budget Advisory Committee 1 2 (a)–(b) * * * 3 4 (c) Membership 5 6 (1) The advisory committee consists of an equal number of trial court presiding 7 judges and court executive officers reflecting diverse aspects of state trial 8 courts, including urban, suburban, and rural locales; the size and adequacy of 9 budgets; and the number of authorized judgeships. For purposes of this rule, 10 “presiding judge” means a current presiding judge or an immediate past 11 presiding judge. 12 13 (2) A presiding judge and court executive officer No more than two members 14 may be from the same court. 15 16 (3) The chairs of the Trial Court Presiding Judges Advisory Committee and the 17 Court Executives Advisory Committee serve as ex officio voting members. 18 19 (4) Notwithstanding rule 10.31(e), a presiding judge is qualified to complete his 20 or her term on the advisory committee even if his or her term as presiding 21 judge of a trial court ends. 22 23 (5) The Administrative Office of the Courts’ Judicial Council’s chief of staff, 24 chief administrative officer, chief operating officer, and director of the fiscal 25 services office Finance serve as non-voting members. 26 27 (Subd (c) amended effective October 28, 2014.) 28 29 (d) Cochairs 30 31 The Chief Justice appoints a presiding judge and the Director of the Fiscal Services 32 Office to serve as cochairs. 33 34 Rule 10.64 amended effective October 28, 2014; adopted effective February 20, 2014. 35 (effective on October 28, 2014 Rule 10)Cal. R. Ct. 10.64—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 10.63—
California Rules of Court — Rule 4.405 — Definitions As used in this division, unless the context otherwise requires: (1)–(3) * * * (4) “Aggravation” or “circumstances in aggravation” means facts factors that justify the imposition of the upper prison term the court may consider in its broad discretion in imposing one of the three authorized prison terms referred to in Penal Code section 1170(b). (5) “Mitigation” or “circumstances in mitigation” means facts factors that justify the imposition of the lower of three authorized prison terms the court may consider in its broad discretion in imposing one of the three authorized prison terms referred to in section 1170(b) or facts factors that may justify the court in striking the additional punishment for an enhancement when the court has discretion to do so. (6)–(10) * * * Rule 4.405 amended effective May 23, 2007; adopted as rule 405 effective July 1, 1977; previously renumbered effective January 1, 2001; previously amended effective July 28, 1977, January 1, 1991, July 1, 2003, and January 1, 2007. Advisory Committee Comment “Base term” is the term of imprisonment selected under section 1170(b) from the three possible terms. (See section 1170(a)(3); People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331, 349.) Following the United States Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S.__, the Legislature amended the determinate sentencing law. (See Sen. Bill 40; Stats. 2007, ch. 3.) To comply with those changes, these rules were also amended. In light of those amendments, for clarity, the phrase “base term” in (4) and (5) was replaced with “one of the three authorized prison terms.” It is an open question whether the definitions in (4) and (5) apply to enhancements for which the statute provides for three possible terms. The Legislature in SB 40 amended section 1170(b) but did not modify sections 1170.1(d), 12022.2(a), 12022.3(b), or any other section providing for an enhancement with three possible terms. The latterCal. R. Ct. 4.405—
The State Medicaid Manual | CMSCCC-270326—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT21422d8840605842e30da7a62340690e53263af9—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KIMESHA MONAE WILLIAMS et al. — Court of Appeal Opinion5d0da6fbc6a7ba4e9bdb333dfdf1171dad2d3c59—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 5.2—
Judicial Council Forms — Publishers List (effective January 1, 2026)6b73b0b55d0e5e5386f58e4f5ab2a9f19ba25ff0—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALBERT CAMACHO — Court of Appeal Opinion (B339615)B339615—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PETE BANSEN et al. — Court of Appeal Opinionf8e963715cb3d5332070563cd9458f4b2a3da331—
= = = = = = — E E = = = = = — — — E — — = — = = = E E = =CCC-271721—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. 111 W 7 OWNER, LLC — Court of Appeal Opinion (B350201)B350201—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 10.635—
Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDRE MARSALIS SANCHEZ et al. — Court of Appeal OpinionCal. R. Ct. 8.1115—
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ISAAC DANIEL LARA — Court of Appeal Opinion (B341682)B341682—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 10.1014—
California Rules of Court — Rule 1.31 — Mandatory forms (effective September 1, 2017 Rule 1)Cal. R. Ct. 1.31—
California Rules of Court — Rule 3.1161 — Request to make minor’s information confidential in civil harassment 1 protective order proceedings (effective September 1, 2020 Rule 3)Cal. R. Ct. 3.1161—
California Rules of Court — Rule 10.855 — Superior court records sampling program 1 2 (a)–(b) * * * 3 4 (c) Comprehensive and significant records 5 6 Each superior court must preserve forever comprehensive and significant court 7 records as follows: 8 9 (1) All records filed before 1911; 10 11 (2) If practicable, all records filed after 1910 and before 1950; 12 13 (3) All case indexes; and 14 15 (4) All judgment books if the court maintains judgment records separate from the 16 case files; 17 18 (5) All minute books if the court maintains minutes separate from the case files; 19 and 20 21 (6) All registers of action if the court maintains them. 22 23 (4) All noncapital cases in which the California Supreme Court has issued a 24 written opinion. 25 26 (Subd (c) amended effective July 1, 2016; adopted as subd (b); previously amended and 27 relettered effective January 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.) 28 29 (d) Sample records 30 31 If a superior court destroys court records without preserving them in a medium 32 described in (h) (g), the court must preserve forever a sample of each year’s court 33 records as provided by this rule of all cases, including sealed, expunged, and other 34 confidential records to the extent permitted by law. 35 36 (Subd (d) amended effective July 1, 2016; adopted as subd (c); relettered effective January 37 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2007.) 38 39 (e) Court record defined 40 41 (effective on July 1, 2016 11 Rule 10)Cal. R. Ct. 10.855—
AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURTCal. R. Ct. 2.850—
← Previous pagePage 9 of 9 · 438 documents

About this database — California Rules of Court

California primary law. Statutes/codes and bills live in LegInfo bulk on disk; regulations (CCR) are not available from a free official scrape (Westlaw-gated).