Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1837-03-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 5 Cranch 112 · 5 D.C. 112
Opinion
The Court said, that the wager was void in law, and that the witness, not being, in fact, interested, could not be excluded; but that the circumstances attending the wager would go to the credit of the witness.