UNITED STATES versus TWENTY BARRELS FLOUR, TWO BARRELS WHISKEY, and ONE BATEAU, claimed by ORVILLE COOK, 5 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 185

Journal Entries: (

i) Oct. 16, 1819: postponed;

(2) Nov. 1, 1819: continued;

(3) Sept. 27, 1820: proclamation made; claimant appeared; testimony of Bazel Mettez, Joseph Obert, Joseph LaPlant, Charles J. Lanman, Amasa Bagley, David C. McKinstry, Robert Smart, and John J. Deming; notice of intention to apply for remission of forfeiture; continued;

(4) Sept. 27, 1821 ¡goods decreed forfeited;

(3) Sept. 16,1822: judgment against claimant for appraised value of goods;

(6) Oct. 3, 1823: motion by Orville Cook for rule on marshal to show cause why interest collected on judgment should not be refunded. Papers in File (1819-23):

(1) Letter—collector to United States attorney; (2) letter—inspector to collector; (3) libel; (4) claimant’s bond; (3) collector’s certificate; (6) copy of order for delivery to claimant, collector’s order, receipt; (7) letter— United States attorney to collector; (8) copy of order appointing appraisers, appraisers’ return; (9) memo, of proceedings made by United States attorney; (10) receipt—appraisers to clerk; (11) precipe for subpoenas; (12-14) subpoenas; (13) precipe for subpoenas; (16-17) subpoenas; (18) draft of record ordered by presiding judge; (19) certificate as to correctness of record;

(20) Treasury decision; (21) letter—Treasury Department to clerk; (22) receipt—marshal to clerk; (23) precipe for fi. fa; (24) writ of fi. fa. and return; (23-28) requests to pay witness fees; (29) receipt for witness fees; (30) receipt—collector to clerk; (31) letter— United States attorney to marshal; (32) memo, re payment of costs; (33) bill of costs; (34) memo, re execution. File No..... Lamed Docket, MS p. 10.