Asa B. Hogins versus Joseph Arnold. June 28th. After a verdict for the plaintiff in this action, which was debt upon a bond, judgment was arrested, and it was held, that the defendant was entitled to costs, by virtue of St. 1784, c. 28, § 9. And see Revised Stat. c. 121, § 1. S. D. Parker, for the plaintiff, cited Brown v. Austin, 1 Mass. R. 208. Leland, for the defendant, cited Hart v. Fitzgerald, 2 Mass R. 512; Smith v. Floyd, 2 Pick. 275.