Undercofler, Presiding Justice. Appellant was held in contempt for failure to comply with a provision of a divorce decree which he contends is a property settlement. He argues that the provision merely declares the rights of the parties and since the decree did not command performance he cannot be held in contempt. We affirm. Duke v. Smith, 242 Ga. 207 (1978). We find no merit in the remaining enumerations of error. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.