Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1834-10-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 3 F. Cas. 102 · 4 Cranch, C. C. 332
Opinion
THE COURT (nem. con.) refused to discharge the boy, being of opinion that the orphans’ court had jurisdiction to bind out orphan children; and that the binding was in the usual form in which that court exercised its jurisdiction. See Hines v. Hewitt, [Case No. 6,520.]