Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1807-06-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 30 F. Cas. 434 · 1 Cranch, C. C. 401
Opinion
But THE COURT refused, because the marshal, by the appearance, was discharged from the duty of keeping the defendant in custody, and it is to be presumed has discharged him, and cannot retake him.