Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1806-07-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 30 F. Cas. 536 · 1 Cranch, C. C. 346
Opinion
THE COURT refused a continuafiee, because the plaintiff had not taken or moved for an attachment against his witness, John Wood, who lived at Port Tobacco, out of the District of Columbia, and within one hundred miles of this place; not having decided yet that an attachment will not lie for a witness who resides out of the district, and within one hundred miles. See Voss v. Luke [Case No. 17,014]; Park v. Willis [Id. 10,71,6], November term, 1800.