Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1836-03-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 26 F. Cas. 825 · 4 Cranch, C. C. 674
Opinion
THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) was of opinion that the description of the things stolen was too vague, and quashed the indictment. A new indictment was found by the grand jury. [Case No. 15,-547.]