Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1837-03-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 25 F. Cas. 309 · 5 Cranch, C. C. 112
Opinion
THE COURT said, that the wager was void in law. and that the witness, not being, hr fact, interested, could not be excluded; but that the circumstances attending the wager would go to the credit of the witness.