Source: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Date: 1806-06-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 22 F. Cas. 1303 · 1 Cranch, C. C. 319
Opinion
THE COURT refused to condemn the attached effects without proof of the debt, and doubted whether a claim of unliquidated damages can be the ground of an attachment under the act of 1795.