Source: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Date: 1801-07-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 1 Cranch 35 · 1 D.C. 35
Opinion
The Court decided, 1. That the motion might be sustained in the name of Fendall, altHough he had taken the insolvent oath; 2. That the sergeant could not levy the execution of Deneale v. Fendall on the money in his own hands made on the fi. fa. of Fendall v. Toiuers, and that such return was not good. Judgment for the amount made on the fi.fa., and fifteen per cent, per annum damages. Affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 1 Cranch, 117.