Source: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Date: 1803-07-01
Jurisdiction: United States
Citation: 1 Cranch 139 · 1 D.C. 139
Opinion
The Court decided, on a motion of Mr. Woodivard, for a rule answer in Chancery, that such a rule need not be laid, but an attachment might go, of course, after the fourth day of next term.